Articles by "Science"

 

Fast charging is not as fast as possible. The hidden dangers of high-power fast charging are not just explosions

Among the recently released mobile phones, Black Shark 3 supports 65W fast charging. Another news said that the upcoming Red Devils 5G mobile phone also supports 65W fast charging. If the realme X50 Pro is added, multiple Snapdragon 865 flagship phones use 65W fast charge.

Phone Battery Charging Fast Charging Phones Analysis


Before that, 65W fast charge was only used by OPPO. This year, more mobile phone manufacturers use 65W fast charging, the ultimate goal is to make charging faster. On the surface, the charging speed of 65W fast charge is really fast, which can shorten the charging process to less than half an hour. As everyone knows, fast charging is not as fast as possible. High-power fast charging has some hidden safety hazards.

High-power fast charge faces the risk of battery explosion

A very simple technical principle, the greater the fast charging power of the mobile phone, the faster the charging rate, and the greater the risk of battery explosion. Because of this, the mainstream fast charge technology of mobile phones remained at about 40W last year. These days, flagship phones use 55W fast charge, and a few brands used 65W fast charge.

Last year, Xiaomi once showed 100W fast charge, and vivo showed 120W fast charge. However, 65W fast charge is currently the bottleneck of mobile phone fast charge technology. To put it plainly, the greater the fast charge power, the greater the risk of battery explosion. 
How to minimize the explosion risk of high-power fast charge is the key to commercialization of high-power fast charge.

At present, both the 65W fast charge of OPPO and the 65W fast charge of Black Shark 3 mobile phones use dual cell technology. 
As we all know, most mobile phones are single cells, and only a few mobile phones like iPhone X are dual cells. 
These dual cell cores for mobile phones that support 65W fast charge technology are designed to reduce the risk of battery explosion during high-speed charging.

Compared with single cell, what is the difference between dual cell charging?

Generally speaking, 65W fast charging is to divide the charging power of 65W on two cells, which can reduce the charging power of single cell. According to the average apportionment, the charging power of a battery cell is only 32.75W, which is a very safe range. 
However, if there is a problem with one of the cells, the cell phone battery still faces the risk of explosion.

The price of high-power fast charging is at the expense of battery capacity

In many people's opinion, faster charging with higher power can shorten the charging time of mobile phones. 
As everyone knows, the price of high-power fast charging is the expense of battery capacity. Frankly, this approach is a little bit worthwhile.

From a technical point of view, the greater the power of mobile phone fast charging, the smaller the battery density. So, what is the relationship between battery density and battery capacity? 
For a battery with the same volume, the higher the battery density, the larger the battery capacity. Therefore, Apple's mobile phone battery looks very thin and has a larger battery capacity than other mobile phones. This is because Apple ’s mobile phone has a higher battery density.

In order to ensure battery safety, the density of mobile phone batteries that support high-power fast charging cannot be too large. In other words, with the same battery volume, the larger the fast charge power, the smaller the battery capacity. 
For example, OPPO Find X2 supports 65W fast charging, the battery capacity is only 4260mAh, and the capacity of a single cell is only 2130mAh. 
You know, this year's Snapdragon 865 flagship, the battery capacity is above 4500mAh.

Compared with 4G mobile phones, 5G mobile phones are thicker and weigh more than 200g, which is quite heavy. If the phone supports faster charging with greater power, the only way to keep the battery capacity constant is to make the battery larger. As a result, the mobile phone will be thicker, which is difficult for consumers to accept.

For many years, Apple mobile phones only support 18W fast charging, not because Apple technology is backward, but because to maintain the thinness and lightness of the iPhone appearance, the use of higher power fast charging requires sacrificing battery capacity. 
In addition, the density of Apple's mobile phone battery is too large, and there are too many technical problems to be solved using high-power fast charging.

Conclusion

Although the high-power fast charging of mobile phones has solved the risk of battery explosion, this technology, sacrificed for battery capacity, does not greatly improve the user experience. Indeed, 65W fast charge increases the charging speed, but the battery is less durable. 40W fast charge has a slower charging speed, but the battery is more durable. Needless to say, like other technologies, fast charging technology also needs a balance.


[[SHARE This Article >>>>

 


Information Viruses Should Be Prevented and Controlled

The danger of the new crown virus has been widely known, strict prevention and control measures have been fully implemented, and the spread of the epidemic has been initially curbed. However, the situation of the epidemic is still severe, which is the crucial moment for all people to fight the "epidemic". To win this people's war, we must strictly prevent and control the spread of the new crown virus infection, as well as prevent and control the spread of information viruses.

An important new feature of the fight against the new crown pneumonia epidemic is that the spread of the epidemic information is faster and it has a greater impact on people's psychological emotions. During the SARS epidemic 17 years ago, the main channels for people to obtain information were traditional media such as radio, television, and newspapers. Now almost everyone has a smartphone.

The Internet is full of attention and discussion about the latest epidemic. In addition to the latest news from mainstream media, various self-media platforms such as public accounts, WeChat groups, friends and Douyin are also tracking the latest epidemic situation and publishing various opinions. Everyone is a press release officer and current political commentator, and can send and receive information and comment on current affairs anytime, anywhere. The outbreak of online information about the new crown pneumonia epidemic is dizzying.

Party and government decision-making measures, the causes of changing epidemic conditions, knowledge methods to prevent infection, touching deeds of white angels, mortal things that have been silently dedicated to the fight against the epidemic, and the spirit of struggle of infected patients. These instant real and temperature information. It is always inspiring and inspiring, giving people courage and confidence, wisdom and strength.

There are also masterpieces of folks on the Internet spurting out, and ordinary people entertain themselves in endless patterns, which also makes people a little more relaxed and happy in the tedious and isolated life.

It is worth noting that among the mass of information coming from the face, there is no lack of miscellaneous information such as epidemic rumors, counterfeiting prevention, incitement to emotions, or the signboards of experts and scholars, or the title of "front-line", "inside information", "new research "Achievements" and other names, making people difficult to distinguish between true and false, unknowingly recruited, as if "information virus", causing panic to the audience and disrupting the epidemic prevention and control.

Information or computer virus


How to effectively prevent and control information virus infection?

Don't believe it. Make more judgments and thoughts on information from FB, Insta, Weibo, WeChat circle of friends, public account, etc., especially for those information that catches the eye, the content is sensational, is counterintuitive and the source is ambiguous. Add a few more question marks to increase alertness.

Don't mess around. Forwarding is easy. With a touch of the touch screen, text and images with a large amount of information can be spread across the river. Turning around without thinking about the false information confirmed will not only endanger the society, but also damage its own image.

Don't be silent, dare to "bright sword". It should be noted that cyberspace is not a clean place, especially when someone on the Internet maliciously speculates on hot and sensitive events, using wrong positions, extreme attitudes, and apparently inciting dissatisfaction with the party's leadership and the socialist system. Distinguish between right and wrong, and don't fall into traps or fall into traps.

The struggle to prevent and control information viruses is also "bringing together on a narrow path to win the brave" and requires a "bright sword spirit." In the face of false and false epidemic information and new prevention measures, functional departments and professionals should promptly release authoritative information to clarify the fog.

Everyone has a responsibility to "scream out loudly on the road" against those who have rumored, vilified the frontline anti-epidemic heroes, maliciously attacked the party's leadership and the socialist system.



[[>>Share on Social Media for Awareness to Help Someone who may be in Need of this Info, Share>> >>

 

The US Telemedicne Policy Latest

US telemedicine industry has undergone a sea change through the history and evolution of the Texas Telemedicine Act and the implications of the passage of the Act for Texas, the telehealth industry, and the United States as a whole. Thus you will clearly understand the latest US telemedicine policy.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott on Tele medicine

On May 27, 2017, Governor of Texas (hereinafter referred to as Texas) Greg Abbott passed the state's telemedicine legislation bill (the Senate Bill SB1107 and House Bill HB2697), abolishing doctors only in face-to-face contact with patients After that, it is possible to provide telehealth services.

As the last of the 50 states in the United States to repeal this rule, the Texas Telemedicine Act allowed a number of telemedicine companies, such as Teladoc, American Well, Doctor on Demand, and MD Live, to extend their remote video business to National market.
The US Telemedicine Policy Illustration
Telemedicine Laws

But in a strict sense, telemedicine operations in Arkansas and Idaho still have limitations because the two states still have restrictions on telemedicine telephony services.

Texas is the second largest state in the United States and the largest state in the southern United States. The passage of the bill is not only about opening up a new market for telemedicine, but more importantly, enabling the people of Texas to enjoy more diverse medical services. In addition, the bill marks the end of a two-year lawsuit between Teladoc and the Texas Medical Board, making it a landmark antitrust case in the US medical industry.

At this historic moment, the Internet medical information website MobiHealthNews sorted out the history of the Texas Telemedicine Act. This article takes you through the history and evolution of the bill and the implications of the passage of the bill for Texas, the telemedicine industry, and the United States as a whole.

Teladoc and Medical Board lawsuits, litigation costs up to $7 million a quarter

Texas has a large number of rural poor, and telehealth can bring scarce medical services to these people. From this perspective, it should not be the last state to approve telemedicine business.

Jason Gorevic, CEO of Teladoc, said: “There are 35 families in Texas who do not have any family doctors. The state has the highest population growth rate in the United States, but its number of primary care physicians per capita is only the fifth lowest. Access to services is a big problem in Texas."

Dallas-based Teladoc has been operating in Texas since 2005. However, in 2010, the Texas Medical Board passed a revision of the prescription rules for telemedicine, requiring doctors to conduct face-to-face consultations with patients before providing telemedicine services.

Medical committees vs Telemedicine companies

Medical committees and telemedicine companies have different interpretations of this revision. Companies such as Teladoc and MDLive believe that this regulation is only for video-based businesses, and it only limits video services and continues to provide telephony services in Texas. However, the Medical Council believes that these companies have exploited linguistic vulnerabilities and that their intentions are clear: to ban all telemedicine services that are not face-to-face.

Therefore, when Teladoc continued to provide telemedicine services to the Texas public by telephone, the Texas Medical Board sent an open letter to them asking them to stop providing any services immediately. A contingency rule was issued that clarified any ambiguity between the telephone and video services in the previous version. Teladoc then countered that the rule was not followed by proper procedures and prosecuted.

Lawsuit in 2015

The lawsuit has intensified in April 2015 and may have been directly reported to the Supreme Court. Teladoc sued the Medical Board under the Anti-Monopoly Law, calling it a licensed physician organization that would limit the development of telemedicine to bring economic benefits, and the Medical Board could not pass such a regulation aimed at curbing other competitors.

The lawsuit took two years and Teledoc paid a huge economic price for it. According to the company's 2016 public financial report, spending on litigation is as high as $7 million in just one quarter. But Teledoc CEO Gorevic believes that all this is worthwhile because they are fighting for their right to run their business and the right of customers to get better medical services. On the other hand, they dare to stand up and challenge the authority, and the side also shows their leadership in the telemedicine industry.

From the perspective of the lawsuit, everything seems to be more favorable to Teledoc. The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), an important antitrust agency of the US government, even submitted to the court a "Friends of the Court" complaint that favored Teledoc's position. But in the end, both sides realized that the long-lost lawsuit would only hurt both sides. Instead of appealing to a higher court, it would be better to sit down and negotiate. Last fall, the two sides demanded that the case be suspended and began to show signs of reconciliation.

Gorevic concluded that the signing of the bill would completely end the lawsuit because it was "no need for litigation."
Telemedicine Laws and Practice
Telemedicine Practice

Good Telemedicine policy can solve problems in the medical system and promote the legislative process

 Since 2015, Teledoc has been in court with the Texas Medical Board. For two years, people have been trying to use legislation to end the lawsuit and reach a compromise.

According to LaToya Thomas, director of the National Center for Policy Resources at the American Association of Telemedicine (ATA), legal guidance is not only the only way to resolve the conflict between Teledoc and the Texas Medical Board, but also a necessary way to prevent similar conflicts in the future.

Thomas believes that the case in Texas is very special because it involves not only the medical committee but also other committees. The state’s advisory committee had wanted to pass similar rules, but fortunately it was blocked. Therefore, it is necessary to have the participation of state legislators.

Bills on Teledoc case

Nora Belcher, director of the Texas Electronic Medical Alliance, said that the early legislative attempts were too confusing to be passed in the legislature. Therefore, although a series of bills have been proposed to solve the Teledoc case, it is difficult to really play a role because they are all different from different angles.

In this case, Belcher, Teladoc, the Medical Council, and a number of other stakeholders, including hospitals and care practitioners, began to sit down and discuss together. They tried to meet a full year before the start of the Legislative Council and drafted a bill that would satisfy everyone.

It turns out that there are not too many requirements for suppliers (referring to medical service providers): they want to ensure a sound standard of care, do not change the licensing arrangements, clarify matters related to reimbursement, especially the medical insurance plan will not be a phone call. Ask a doctor or fax a bill. But the legislature does not want to pass a “supplier bill” but will protect all telemedicine providers. The bill passed this time solves all these problems.

Gorevic believes that the root cause of the partnership between Texas and remote companies is the shift in perceptions of telehealth from 2010 to the present.

Government Regulator on Telemedicine Policy

“Government’s regulators tend to protect the status quo in change,” he said. “Texas is the case. If new things show their value and take steps to ensure equality, the more they can break the status quo and start adapting to innovation. As a leader in the telemedicine market, Teledoc is able to drive this process. Over time, people are beginning to understand that telemedicine is not a new gadget, but a real solution in the medical system. Problems and industries that can bring great value to the people of Texas."

In the end, the bill was unanimously passed in both the parliament and the Senate. The bill passed this time even includes some novel forward-looking regulations, such as redefining storage and forwarding technologies, including cloud infrastructure. However, the bill also makes Texas a 20th state that prohibits the use of telemedicine for abortion, showing that there are still many challenges in the future development of telemedicine.

3 Acts of Texas Telemedicine on Telehealth reveal US TelemedicinePolicy

At the 185th Legislative Council in Texas, SB1107 was the most important bill on telemedicine. In addition, the following three telemedicine bills were passed in the Legislative Council.

The SB1633 will allow more remote pharmacy technology to be used in areas where there are no pharmacies in Texas. Another bill, HB1697, will provide a donation program for remote neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) services for premature babies. Then there is the SB922, which will ensure that the school's telehealth services are reimbursed for Medicaid.

In addition to SB1633, two other bills have been submitted to the governor. The remote pharmacy bill is currently being settled with the House of Representatives and the Senate.

In this regard, Belcher said: "This year is a surprising year for us. Last year we submitted 17 bills, only 2 of which were passed. If three of the four bills passed this year, not only It will be a structural victory and very symbolic."
US Laws on Tele medicine
Conduction of Telemedicine

Telehealth expands its business in Texas, and four telemedicine companies in the US are optimistic

 Although the current regulatory status is still not friendly, the four top telehealth companies in the United States have already established some businesses in Texas. Teladoc and MDLive have been operating telephone services based on their understanding of existing regulations. American Well has partnered with Texas hospitals to use the company's telemedicine services during hospital visits without any legal problems; mental illness It has not been within the prescribed limits, so Doctor on Demand has been providing telephone mental health services throughout the state.
However, with the passage of the bill, all four companies will be able to implement remote video services in Texas and across the country.

According to Belcher, Texas is the last state to allow telemedicine companies to conduct video services in the state. This is very important for these companies because it means they can finally strategically deploy in all states across the United States.

American Well's attitude was the most cautious before the bill passed. Although the company is providing telephony services in Texas as described above, company CEO Roy Schoenberg still emphasizes that unless the medical committee explicitly supports other business methods for telemedicine, they will not expand their business in Texas. He said with no irony: "We don't think that operators who are trying to slap words are thinking that doing this or letting doctors do this will not be sued."

However, after the passage of the bill, American Well believes that this will not only benefit the company's direct sales business, but also help strengthen corporate partnerships. Schoenberg said that due to the medical committee's regulations, American Well did not directly operate in Texas, and many of the large national insurance companies that cooperated with it, such as Anthem and United, were also affected and could not enter the Texas market.
Laws on Teledoctor or ehealth

The New Law on Tele-medicine

The new law just passed opened the way for American Well and its customers to use its platform to provide a variety of services in Texas. Previously, these customers were only able to follow up patients, and now they can finally open the system and take advantage of all their functions.

Hill Ferguson, CEO of Doctor on Demand, emailed MobiHealthNews that in Texas, they have been providing mental health services through the video platform for a long time and have been successful in this regard. With the passage of the new bill, his company will gradually expand to other areas of care based on mental health business.

And MDLive's CEO, Scott Decker, is not worried about the passage of the bill, which will make the competition more intense. He believes that MDLive has established a stable patient population in the Texas telephone service market, and these patients will not easily switch to other video services. The passage of the bill allows it to have a wider display in Texas, and the solid user base is the company's largest net income guarantee.

The biggest obstacle to the development of telehealth will be reimbursement

 The passage of the Texas Telemedicine Bill was a huge victory, but it was far from the end of the legislative road. ATA's Latoya Thomas pointed out that some states' telemedicine situation is not optimistic, such as Connecticut and Rhode Island still have telehealth restrictive bills for ophthalmology; Arkansas still has a telephone ban; Iowa Physical Therapy Committee A new regulation is in place that only licensed physiotherapists can provide telehealth services for physical therapy.

Thomas also said that Texas's legislative victory is a good first step and a good example for other states. If Texas can do this, other states are likely to follow suit. “I think other states should learn from the Texas experience and give a green light to local telemedicine.”

Teladoc CEO Gorevic believes that all parties are very concerned about the telemedicine legislation in Texas. The support of the Texas legislature is an important recognition of the value of telehealth. In addition, it complements the positive actions of Washington.

For example, the 21st Century Therapy Act signed by Obama in December 2016, the High-Quality Results and Outcomes Necessary to Improve Chronic, which was just passed in the Senate Finance Committee in May 2017. High quality outcomes and prognosis, etc., support the use of telemedicine to improve the health care system.

Obstacle in Development of Tele-medicine

On the other hand, most people agree that the biggest obstacle to the development of telemedicine will be reimbursement. As MDLive's CEO Decker said, the next legislative focus will be on medical insurance reimbursement for telehealth outpatient clinics across the US. At present, even in a state like Texas that achieves telemedicine equality, its reimbursement is actually very difficult.

Schoenberg, CEO of American Well, believes that “equality” looks good in the legal provisions, but if doctors ask questions about providing telehealth services to patients and receiving money, the answer is an embarrassing uncertainty. According to Schoenberg, the root cause of the problem is the attitude of the federal health insurance. Maybe it will change in the future, but so far, people can only wait and see, not sure how to do it.

Conclusion

Of course, Texas's telemedicine legislation is a great victory. Both parties involved and legislators can celebrate this rare legislative win-win situation. Especially for Texas, the second largest state in the United States, it can win more space for telehealth development here, and it is a great encouragement to all companies in the industry.




Tags: #USA, #United States Telemedicine,  #American Telemedicine, American Telemedicine Policy, #Telemedicine in America, #Telemedicine Laws, #Telemedicine State laws, #Telemedicine Legal


[[SHARE This Article >>>>


What is a smartphone? (Characteristics and Feature)

Meaning of Smartphone: In today's advanced technology, smartphones have become a necessity of life. I believe that many netizens are like editors. They will bring their mobile phones wherever they go. Even if there is no phone or text message, they will play games, go to vvfit.com or WhatsApp. Even swipe on Tinder, so what is a smartphone? Now the editor will discuss the science with you in detail.

Features and Characteristics of Smart Phones


Smartphones and Personal Computer

Smartphone (smartphone) is simply a mobile phone with an open and independent operating system. 
In addition to the phone's calling function, users can also install software, games and other third-party service providers' programs. 

Like a personal computer, a smart phone has an independent operating system and an independent running space.
 Users can install programs provided by third-party service providers such as software, games, navigation, etc., and can implement wireless network access through mobile communication networks. The general term for such a mobile phone.

The range of smartphones has been covered all over the world. Because smartphones have three characteristics: 
i. Excellent operating system, free installation of various software
ii. Full-screen full-touch operation
iii. Keyboard phones completely ended in the far previous years.

At present, most mobile phone manufacturers in the world have smart phone products

The best phones are:
  1. Finland's Nokia, American Apple
  2. Canadian RIM (Blackberry)
  3. American Motorola
  4.  Chinese Taiwan HTC (htc) 

Among them, the four major brands of Apple, Samsung, Nokia and HTC are the most widely known in the world.
While China’s Lenovo Lenovo, Huawei HUAWEI, Xiaomi Mi, BBK (VIVO), ZTE ZTE, Coolpad Coolpad, Meizu MEIZU, OPPER OPPO, Gionee GIONEE, and Tianyu (Tianyu) K-Touch top ten brands have attracted much attention in China.

Smartphone is a mobile phone with a corresponding open operating system installed in the mobile phone, and there were about 450 million by the end of 2008. 

What are the commonly used operating systems in Smart Phones?

 Symbian, Windows Mobile, iOS, Linux (including Android, Maemo, MeeGo and WebOS), Palm OS and BlackBerry OS. 
The application software between them is incompatible with each other. Because third-party software can be installed, smart phones have rich functions.

What are the Major Characteristics of Smart Phones?

1. Have the ability to access the Internet wirelessly, that is, CDMA 1X or 3G networks that need to support GPRS or CDMA networks under the GSM network.

2. Has the functions of PDA, including PIM (Personal Information Management), schedule memo, task scheduling, multimedia applications, browsing the web.

3. With an open operating system, you can install more applications, so that the functions of the smartphone can be infinitely expanded.

4. Humanized, the machine function can be expanded according to individual needs.

5. Powerful function, strong expansion performance, and more third-party software support.



Share on Social Media for Personal Information, Awareness, Safety and Professional Development of all >>

Follow this Publication for Most Advanced Information )]] 



[[SHARE This Article >>>>

  

The Lancet: Increasing chronic diseases stimulate the development of COVID-19

The Lancet published a special issue Global Burden of Disease Study.

In GBD2019, important data related to China from where COVID arose are as follows:

Since 1990, the life expectancy of the Chinese population has increased by nearly 10 years, from 68.1 years to 77.6 years in 2019. The healthy life expectancy of the Chinese population has also increased significantly. 

The healthy life expectancy of the new born population in 2019 is 8 years longer than that of the population born 30 years ago.

Since 1990, the health loss of the Chinese population caused by non-communicable diseases has increased by more than 40%. 

In 2019, premature deaths and poor health caused by non-communicable diseases reached 85%.

In the past 30 years, the biggest diseases that contributed to the increase in health loss in China were ischemic heart disease, stroke, lung cancer, diabetes, age-related diseases and other hearing loss.

 In East Asia, the main risk factor for health loss in 2019 is tobacco use. Hypertension, unhealthy diets, and air pollution each account for 10-15% of China's disease burden in 2019.

In 2019, China’s five major mortality risk factors were smoking (approximately 2.7 million deaths), high blood pressure (2.6 million deaths), unhealthy diet (2.02 million deaths), air pollution (1.85 million deaths), and high blood sugar (107 Ten thousand people died).


The most comprehensive global research on COVID-19

 The analysis of 286 causes of death, 369 diseases and injuries, and 87 risk factors in 204 countries and regions reveals how prepared the world's population is in response to the COVID-19 epidemic affecting basic health.

The global crisis of chronic diseases and the failure of global public health to contain the increase in highly preventable risk factors have made the global population vulnerable to public health emergencies like the COVID-19 epidemic.

We need to take urgent action to deal with chronic diseases, social inequality, and the global syndemic that coexists with COVID-19 to ensure a healthier health system and healthier people, so that countries are more capable of responding to the threat of future epidemics.

The Global Burden of Disease Study provides a roadmap for areas with the highest demand, including data on risk factors and chronic disease burden in specific countries.

The interaction between COVID-19 and the continued global growth of chronic diseases and related risk factors (including obesity, hyperglycemia, and outdoor air pollution) has created a perfect storm over the past 30 years, stimulating the development of COVID-19.

Increasing chronic diseases stimulate the development of COVID-19, says The Lancet Published research. Infographics


The Lancet published the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD). The latest research findings provide new insights into how countries are prepared to respond to the impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on basic health and clarify the true scale of the challenge of preventing further threats from the pandemic.

This study also shows that the increase in the number of people exposed to key risk factors (including high blood pressure, high blood sugar, body mass index [BMI] and high cholesterol), coupled with certain countries (such as the United States and Caribbean countries) due to cardiovascular disease

 The death toll is also increasing, indicating that the life expectancy growth of the global population may be approaching a turning point.

The author emphasizes that the vision of preventing disease through government actions or through incentives that enable people to develop healthier behaviors and obtain health care resources has not yet been realized around the world.

"Most risk factors can be prevented and treated, and dealing with them will bring huge social and economic benefits. We have not been able to change unhealthy behaviors, especially those related to dietary quality, caloric intake, and physical exercise. Related behaviors.

 Part of the reason is due to policy concerns, public health funding, and insufficient behavioral research.” Professor Christopher Murray, Director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) of the University of Washington, who led this research Say.

Several risk factors highlighted in this study and non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, are all related to the increased risk of serious illness and death caused by COVID-19. 

However, various diseases not only affect each other physiologically; they also interact with social factors. We need to carry out urgent actions to deal with chronic diseases, social inequality, and the global syndemic of COVID-19. 

Comprehensive concurrency refers to the mutual influence of multiple epidemics, which will increase the disease burden of people already affected by the disease and make them more vulnerable.


The Lancet Editor-in-Chief Dr Richard Horton said on COVID-19:

 "The concurrent nature of the threats we face requires us to not only deal with the symptoms, but also urgently deal with the underlying social inequalities (poverty, housing, education, and ethnic issues) that create this situation. ), these issues are powerful determinants of health."

He continued: "COVID-19 is an urgent and long-term public health emergency. The long-term neglect of the current crisis puts the future at risk. So far, COVID-19 has caused more than one million deaths and is non-communicable. 

Disease plays an important role in this process, and it will continue to affect the health of various countries after the epidemic subsides. This global burden of disease study provides a method for how to rebuild the health system after the COVID-19 epidemic. Focus on the regions with the highest demand and the differences between different countries.

The health system is ill-prepared for the rapid growth of non-communicable diseases and disability issues

Although the global healthy life expectancy (the number of years that people can expect to be in good health) has increased steadily between 1990 and 2019 (over 6.5 years), the healthy life expectancy in 198 of the 204 countries we assessed It has not yet reached the same number of years as the overall life expectancy, which shows that people have longer years of unhealthy health.

Disability, rather than premature death, has become an increasingly large part of the global burden of disease, from approximately one-fifth (21%) of the total burden in 1990 to more than one-third of the total burden in 2019 (34 %).


What is disability-adjusted life years or DALYs?

 In 11 countries (including Singapore, Iceland, Norway, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, and Qatar), more than half of the health loss (measured by disability-adjusted life years DALYs) is caused by non-communicable diseases and injuries. Caused by the resulting disability.

In the past few decades, global efforts have been made to deal with infectious diseases and antenatal care, and have successfully improved the health of children under 10 years of age (the overall disease burden has been reduced by about 55%). However, health work for the elderly is still not enough. In contrast to this.

In the past three decades, the top ten causes of global health loss (measured by the absolute value added of DALYs), including six major causes affecting the elderly population: Ischemic heart disease (between 1990 and 2019 Related DALYs increased by 50%), diabetes (148% increase), stroke (32%), chronic kidney disease (93%), lung cancer (69%), and age-related hearing loss (83%). 

In addition, the other four causes are common from adolescence to old age: human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS (HIV/AIDS) (128%), musculoskeletal disease (129%), low back pain (47%), and depression (61%). For example, between 1990 and 2019, DALYs caused by ischemic heart disease in the Philippines increased by more than 400%, while DALYs caused by diabetes in the UAE increased by more than 1,000%. 

The growth of such ill-health conditions poses a threat to some health care systems, which are generally overwhelmed and unable to cope with chronic diseases related to population growth and aging.

The main factors of health loss in 2019 vary greatly depending on the age group. Road traffic injuries, headaches, HIV/AIDS, low back pain, and depression are the main health problems for younger people aged 10 to 49. In contrast, ischemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes are the main causes of health loss for people aged 50 and over.

In the past ten years, global progress in health has been uneven. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have made impressive progress in health, mainly due to successful treatments for infectious diseases, maternal and neonatal diseases. For example, in Ethiopia, Sudan, and Bangladesh, age-standardized health loss rates (DALYs) have decreased by 2% or more per year.

However, the author warns that the health systems of low- and middle-income countries are not adequate to cope with the increasing disease burden caused by non-communicable diseases. 

The proportion of the disease burden caused by these non-communicable diseases in the total disease burden in low- and middle-income countries varies from About one-third in 1990 increased to nearly two-thirds in 2019.

 In addition, although the number of deaths due to infectious diseases in low- and middle-income countries has generally decreased, the number of deaths due to non-communicable diseases is increasing. 

For example, in Uzbekistan, diabetes has risen from the 21st cause of death to the fifth leading cause of death (a 600% increase in deaths). 

Similarly, in the Philippines, ischemic heart disease has risen from the fifth cause of death to the leading cause of death (increased by more than 350%).


In contrast, in some high-income countries, health improvements have begun to stagnate, and have even reversed in several countries, especially in the United States, where the age-standardized death rate has increased by nearly 3 in the past decade. %. 

The author believes that the reasons for the lack of progress may include the increase in obesity, and the decreasing possibility of reducing smoking and the possibility of further improving the coverage of hypertension and high cholesterol treatment, reducing smoking and further improving hypertension and treatment coverage for high cholesterol is necessary to maintain a reduction in deaths from cardiovascular diseases.

"With the increasing proportion of disability in the global burden of disease and the increasing proportion of healthcare expenditures, there is an urgent need to identify a new and more effective intervention."

 Professor Murray said. "As the global population is aging, the demand for medical services for disability and chronic diseases that increase with age will also increase, which will require more funds, strong political commitment, and accountability backed by better data. System and global concerted efforts to prioritize the most vulnerable people" 

The public health system failed to prevent the increase in key risk factors

In the past decade, exposure to several highly preventable risk factors (obesity, hyperglycemia, alcohol use, and drug use) has been particularly serious and worrying (a global increase of 0.5% per year). 

The above-mentioned risk factors have increased the burden of non-communicable diseases and emphasized the urgent need to strengthen public health efforts.

The largest cumulative impact on health comes from a significant increase in metabolic risk factors, which have increased by 1.5% per year since 2010. Overall, metabolic risk factors (ie, high BMI, high blood sugar, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol) accounted for nearly 20% of the total global health loss in 2019, which is 50% higher than in 1990 (10.4%). 

They have also caused a large number of deaths worldwide: in 2019, high blood pressure caused one-fifth of deaths (about 11 million people), and high blood sugar, high BMI, and high cholesterol caused 6.5 million and 5 million deaths respectively. People and 4.4 million.

Among the major noncommunicable disease risk factors, only smoking has been significantly reduced. 

The huge efforts to implement international tobacco control policies have reduced the global impact of smoking by approximately 10% since 2010, although tobacco use (smoking tobacco, second-hand smoke and chewing tobacco) in 2019 has been in many high-income countries (including the United States, Canada, and Japan). 

Belgium, and Denmark) remain the main cause of death, and has claimed nearly 9 million lives worldwide.

The impact of risk factors also varies from region to region. In many parts of Latin America, Asia and Europe, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high BMI, and tobacco use are key factors that lead to unhealthy health.

 In Oceania, malnutrition and air pollution are the main risk factors. The most noticeable difference is in sub-Saharan Africa. Unlike other regions, the main risk factors affecting health here are malnutrition, unsafe water sources, clean conditions and hand washing, air pollution, and dangerous sexual behavior.


Countries should collaborate globally and take actions to make everyone behave healthier as possible

"It is not enough to provide information about the hazards of these risk factors," said Professor Emmanuela Gakidou, a co-author from IHME. "Considering that personal choices are affected by financial status, education, and other choices available, countries should collaborate globally and take actions to make everyone behave healthier as possible. 

At the same time, since decades of exposure to tobacco Lessons are learned from the control. When a major risk to population health (such as obesity) arises, the government may need to take coordinated actions through regulations, taxes, and subsidies."


The Lancet Research conclusion emphasizes: Need to deal with broader determinants of health

Since 2000, underdeveloped countries have made more progress than highly developed countries increasing income, extending the number of years of education, and supporting family planning to extend life expectancy and healthy life expectancy.

The author emphasizes that it should be recognized long ago: the importance of social and economic development to overall health, and the need to take a more comprehensive approach to pay more attention to all factors affecting population health.

"Considering the tremendous impact of social and economic development on healthy development, redouble our efforts in formulating to stimulate economic development, expand educational opportunities, and improve women's status should be the priority of our joint work." Professor Murray said.


The Lancet pointed out that although attention should be paid to controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the community and protecting those most vulnerable to it

The editorial published in this issue of The Lancet pointed out that although attention should be paid to controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the community and protecting those most vulnerable to it, a greater strategy is needed to succeed.

COVID-19 is a comprehensive concurrent situation of coronavirus infection and non-communicable disease epidemic, both of which affect the poor and unequal bottom of society. 


Conclusion

The message of the GBD Institute is that unless the deep-rooted structural inequalities in society are addressed, unless a more liberal immigration policy is adopted, the community will not be able to avoid the impact of future outbreaks of infectious diseases, and population health will not achieve the pursuit of global health advocates. The results. It is time for the global health community to change the direction of its efforts.


[[SHARE This Article >>>>

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget