Latest Post

 

The General Secretary's View of the New World Order from the Current International Situation

With China's peaceful rise and its position at the center of the world stage, the construction of a new world order featuring democracy, rule of law, fairness and rationality has become the basic aspect of the strategic decision-making of the party and the state, and has also become a major subject of theoretical research. Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, General Secretary Xi Jinping has coordinated both domestic and international situations, national governance and global governance. To build a new type of international relations and a fair and reasonable world order centered on win-win cooperation, and to build a community with a shared future for mankind.

 

China and the New World Order

On November 29, 2014, General Secretary Xi Jinping emphasized when attending the Central Foreign Affairs Work Conference: "We must effectively promote multilateral diplomacy, promote the reform of the international system and global governance, and increase the representation and voice of my country and the vast number of developing countries." 

In 2015 On October 12, the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China conducted the 27th collective study on the global governance pattern and global governance system. 

Chinese President and the Communist Party General Secretary Xi Jinping emphasized when presiding over the study that we must assess the situation, strive to seize opportunities, properly respond to challenges, and coordinate domestic.

 The two major international situations will promote the development of the global governance system in a more just and reasonable direction.

 

On a series of major international occasions, President Xi Jinping has also unequivocally advocated promoting global governance reform, building a new type of international relations, and building a new economic and political order. 

On March 27, 2013, President Xi Jinping emphasized at the fifth BRICS leaders' meeting: "No matter how the global governance system changes, we must actively participate and play a constructive role in promoting the international order towards a more just and reasonable one. direction development and provide institutional guarantee for world peace and stability.” 

On March 28, 2014, he pointed out in a speech at the Kölber Foundation in Germany: “We will start from the righteousness of world peace and development, and contribute to China that handles contemporary international relations. Wisdom, contribute to China's plan to improve global governance, and make its own contribution to human society in responding to various challenges in the 21st century." 

On July 15, 2014, he again advocated in his speech at the sixth meeting of the BRICS leaders. : We should adhere to the spirit of cooperation, continue to strengthen solidarity, accommodate each other's concerns, deepen practical cooperation, and work together to achieve economic growth in all countries and provide impetus for improving global governance. 

On July 16, 2014, in his speech at the Brazilian Congress, he proposed that we should strengthen coordination and cooperation in international and multilateral mechanisms such as the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, the G20, and the BRICS countries, gather the strength of developing countries, and actively participate in the global Governance, and strive for more institutional power and voice for developing countries. 

On September 22, 2015, in an interview with The Wall Street Journal, he deeply expounded on the necessity of promoting the reform of the global governance system, pointing out that many people of insight in the world believe that as the world continues to develop and change, as human beings face.

The number of major transnational and global challenges in China is increasing, and it is necessary to adjust and reform the global governance system and mechanism accordingly. 

General Secretary Xi Jinping's important exposition on promoting the reform of the global governance system and governance rules, and building a new type of international relations and world order, profoundly revealed the laws and trajectories of the transformation, development and change of the world today, and pointed out the direction and path to promote the reform of global governance of great strategic significance.

 

China comparison chart with the USA in New World Order

1. Why promote global governance reform and build a new world order? 

Promoting global governance reform and building a new world order is extremely important and urgent for China and the world.

 

First, changes in the international landscape will inevitably require changes in the global governance system. 

Since the beginning of the 21st century, the international balance of power has undergone profound changes, and the international influence of emerging market countries and a large number of developing countries has continued to increase. This is the most revolutionary change in the international balance of power since modern times. For hundreds of years, great powers have competed for interests and hegemony through wars, colonization, and division of spheres of influence. 

The reform of the global governance system is at a historical turning point, and it is the general trend to strengthen global governance and promote the reform of the global governance system. 

The Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee held a special study and discussion on "Global Governance Pattern and Global Governance System", which fully explained that changes in the international pattern put forward new requirements for global governance, and at the same time indicated that China hopes to make a positive contribution to the reform of the global governance system.


 Refer Also: NWO 2022


The world has gone through a process from bipolarity, unipolarity to multipolarity, and the change of the pattern is extremely difficult, requiring corresponding adjustments in theory and order. 

Only by reforming and adjusting outdated international relations can we effectively reflect the changes in the international pattern, promote equal rights, equal opportunities, and equal rules for all countries in international economic cooperation, so that the global governance system can reflect the wishes and interests of most countries in a more balanced manner.

Only then can we more effectively adhere to the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, better maintain, develop and establish the international system with the UN at its core, and then create a brighter future for mankind. 

The main problem with current global governance is that the international voice of developing countries, which account for more than 70% of the world's total population, does not match their size and growing economic power. 

Some developing countries hope that China can contribute more in promoting a fairer and more equitable global governance mechanism, representing them on the world stage with a voice that matches its growing economic strength and rising international status, and adapting the global governance system to the international community. New requirements of the economic structure.

 

Xi  Jinping points Chinese Responsibility on Promoting the reform of the global governance system

Promoting the reform of the global governance system is an unshirkable responsibility of China as a responsible major country. General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out that some developing countries hope that China can contribute more in promoting a more just and reasonable global governance mechanism.

 China also has the responsibility to actively participate in global economic governance, promote the reform of the global governance system, improve the institutional voice of developing countries in global governance, build a broad community of interests, and promote the healthy construction of the international structure and the balance of international power. 

Chinese should strengthen coordination and cooperation with developing countries within international and multilateral mechanisms, actively participate in global governance, and strive for more institutional power and voice for developing countries.

 

Second, the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation urgently needs global governance reform. After more than 30 years of reform and opening up, we are closer to the center of the world stage than ever before, closer to the goal of realizing the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation than ever before, and we have the ability and confidence to achieve this goal as never before. 

At the same time, the more we develop and grow, the greater the resistance and pressure we will encounter, and the more external risks and challenges we will face. Developed countries generally still dominate global governance and the world order. 

China's rapid rise will inevitably face the constraints of existing international rules and national order, and will be restrained by the United States and other Western defending powers. 

By advancing the reform of the global governance system and setting rules and directions for the international governance structure and international system, we are striving to reflect and respect China's due status and role in the international order and long-term institutional arrangements of the international system, and strive for the commanding heights of development. 

As General Secretary Xi Jinping emphasized: "The fundamental purpose of our participation in global governance is to obey and serve the realization of the 'two centenary goals' and the Chinese dream of realizing the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.

To promote the global governance system towards a more just and reasonable The direction of development will create more favorable conditions for my country’s development and world peace.” “my country has entered a critical stage of realizing the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. 

The relationship between China and the world is undergoing profound changes, and the interconnection and interaction between my country and the international community has also changed. 

With unprecedented closeness, my country's dependence on the world and its participation in international affairs is constantly deepening, and the world's dependence on my country and its influence on China are also deepening. 

When we observe and plan reform and development, we must consider and comprehensively use both international and domestic One market, two kinds of resources at home and abroad, and two kinds of rules at home and abroad.”

 

Third, the effective response to global challenges urgently requires the reform of the global governance system. At present, the in-depth development of globalization has more closely linked the interests and destinies of all countries in the world, forming a community of interests in which you are in me and you are in me. 

Many problems are no longer confined to one country, and many challenges are no longer within the capabilities of one country. Global challenges require the concerted efforts of all countries. For example, the post-2015 development agenda, climate change negotiations, reform of the International Monetary Fund, anti-terrorism, anti-corruption, cyber security and other key global governance issues, poverty alleviation and disaster reduction, food security, energy security, humanitarian assistance, prevention of major infectious diseases, etc. This determines that China cannot be alone and govern behind closed doors. Instead, it must integrate into the world system, actively build an open and cooperative governance structure, and strive to effectively connect and complement domestic governance and international governance. 

In the field of economic governance, the global industrial layout is constantly being adjusted, and new industrial chains, value chains, and supply chains are increasingly being formed. However, trade and investment rules have failed to keep up with the new situation, and closed mechanisms and fragmented rules are prominent. The global financial market needs to strengthen its ability to resist risks, but the global financial governance mechanism has not been able to adapt to the new needs, and it is difficult to effectively resolve the frequent turbulence in the international financial market and the accumulation of asset bubbles. 

With the increasing number and overlapping of global challenges, it is the general trend to strengthen global governance and promote the reform of the global governance system.

 

2. The basic orientation of the new type of international relations and the new world order 

What kind of international relations and new world order will we build? There are different answers and solutions in the world. The neo-realist faction among Western scholars put forward the "hegemonic stability theory" and advocated the creation of an omnipotent superpower to lead international affairs. 

The liberal school puts forward the "global governance theory", which advocates that countries weaken or transfer part of their sovereignty and formulate common rules to manage the world. 

The constructivist school throws out the "universal value theory" and advocates the promotion of Western values ​​and social systems to unify the world. However, these "new theories" are stretched thin in explaining the complex and profoundly changing world, show serious conservatism and rigidity when guiding real social practice, and even become the ideological source of social disorder and political turmoil in some parts of the world and a few countries. 

Many leaders and scholars of developing and emerging countries have seen the limitations and harms of these Western theories, but they lack the ability to innovate theoretically, and cannot come up with systematic new theories of global governance. President Xi Jinping has insight into the development trend of the times, represents the interests and aspirations of global justice forces, especially emerging economies and developing countries, put forward major theories on reforming international relations and building a new world order, and systematically expounded on promoting the reform of the global governance system and rules, the general direction of building a new world order, and put forward China's positioning and China's plan, which is to promote the democratization, rule of law, rationalization (justification) of international relations, lead economic globalization, and build a community with a shared future for mankind. These aspects are the target direction, important starting point and practical path for advancing the reform of the global governance pattern, governance system and governance rules.

 

NWO and China

Promote the democratization of international relations. President Xi Jinping pointed out: "We should jointly promote the democratization of international relations. The fate of the world must be jointly controlled by the people of all countries, and the world's affairs should be handled through consultation by the governments and people of all countries. The idea of ​​monopolizing international affairs is out of date. Actions to monopolize international affairs are certainly not successful."

 

In recent years, President Xi Jinping has delivered speeches on promoting the democratization of international relations on many occasions, expounding our position, views and propositions on this issue. 

On July 15, 2014, in his speech at the sixth meeting of the BRICS leaders, he proposed: China should adhere to the spirit of inclusiveness, promote mutual tolerance of different social systems, mutual learning of different cultures and civilizations, and mutual benefit of different development models, and conduct international relations.

Democratization practitioners

China should adhere to the spirit of cooperation, continue to strengthen solidarity, accommodate each other's concerns, deepen practical cooperation, and work together to achieve economic growth in all countries and provide impetus to improve global governance. China should adhere to the spirit of win-win, and take into account the interests of other countries while pursuing our own interests, so as to benefit our own country and the world, and promote a path of win-win cooperation and benign interaction between major countries. 

On July 8, 2015, when meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, we emphasized that we agree that the BRICS countries will unanimously send a positive signal to the world to safeguard the victory of the Second World War, promote world peace and security, and promote the democratization of international relations. 

Brick countries play an important role in improving global governance and strengthening multilateralism. 

On December 4, 2015, when President Xi Jinping presided over the summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation in Johannesburg, he proposed to upgrade the new type of China-Africa strategic partnership to a comprehensive strategic partnership of cooperation. 

The "five pillars" are win-win, exchanges and mutual learning in civilization, mutual assistance in security, and solidarity and cooperation in international affairs. These "five pillars" can be called the cornerstone of the democratization of international relations. 

On September 28, 2015, President Xi Jinping delivered a speech entitled "Jointly Build New Partnerships for Win-Win Cooperation to Build a Community of Shared Future for Mankind" at the general debate of the 70th United Nations General Assembly. 

In his speech, he discussed the democratization of international relations. 

A comprehensive and in-depth elaboration points out: 

China must adhere to multilateralism and not engage in unilateralism. China must pursue the new concept of win-win, multi-win, and win-win, and throw away the old thinking that I win, you lose, and the winner takes all. Consultation is an important form of democracy, and it should also become an important method of modern international governance. 

It is necessary to advocate the settlement of disputes through dialogue and the settlement of differences through consultation. We need to build a global partnership at the international and regional levels, and blaze a new path of state-to-state relations of "dialogue rather than confrontation, and partnership rather than alliance". 

When major powers get along, there should be no conflict, no confrontation, mutual respect, and win-win cooperation. When big countries and small countries get along, they should treat each other as equals, practice the correct concept of righteousness and interests, combine righteousness and interests, and put righteousness more than interest. No matter how the international landscape changes, we must always adhere to equality, democracy, inclusiveness, respect the right of each country to independently choose its social system and development path, respect the diversity of civilizations, and ensure that all countries, big or small, strong or weak, rich or poor, belong to the international community. 

Equal members, the affairs of a country are decided by the people of its own, and the affairs of the international are negotiated by various countries

On January 17, 2017, President Xi Jinping pointed out in his keynote speech at the opening ceremony of the 2017 annual meeting of the World Economic Forum that all countries, big or small, strong or weak, rich or poor, are equal members of the international community and should participate in decision-making and enjoy equal rights. rights and obligations. 

Emerging market countries and developing countries should be given more representation and voice

 China must uphold multilateralism and maintain the authority and effectiveness of the multilateral system. To fulfill the promise and abide by the rules, you cannot choose or choose according to your own wishes. 

China must promote the democratization of international relations, and we cannot pursue "one country's hegemony" or "co-governance by several parties". The destiny of the world should be jointly controlled by all countries, international rules should be jointly written by all countries, global affairs should be jointly governed by all countries, and development achievements should be shared by all countries.

 

Promote the rule of law in international relations 

The rule of law is the basic consensus of a civilized society and the universal pursuit of mankind, and the rule of law is the main theme of our era. "It has become the consensus of most countries to establish international mechanisms, abide by international rules, and pursue international justice." China is entering an era of rule of law, and the international community is showing a trend of rule of law. Just as many domestic issues have been brought into the track of the rule of law, many issues between countries, regions and even around the world are increasingly included in the track of the rule of law. In the context of the rule of law in the global governance structure, the transformation of the model of raising international affairs to legal issues is to take political, economic, cultural, military, environmental and other issues as legal issues. By legalizing affairs and issues in various fields of international relations, the international community has entered a new era of pluralistic coexistence from the era of power politics. 

To date, the organs of the United Nations system have carried out many activities in a very wide range of fields to promote the rule of law at the national and international levels. The United Nations actively promotes the establishment of the international rule of law and has achieved many achievements. 

The 2005 World Summit Outcome identified the rule of law as a value and fundamental principle and called for the full implementation of the rule of law at the national and international levels. 

The General Assembly of the United Nations, its Sixth Committee and the International Law Commission, are devoted to the formulation of international treaties and the codification of international law, making active contributions to "international legislation". The Security Council actively prevents and resolves regional conflicts, establishes ad hoc criminal courts, brings individuals who violate international humanitarian law and human rights law to justice, and maintains international peace and security through the rule of law. 

The International Court of Justice resolves international disputes through judicial means, and its judgments and advisory opinions clarify the relevant principles and rules of international law, enriching and developing international law. 

Beginning in 2006, the Sixth Committee of the United Nations General Assembly began to discuss the issue of the rule of law at the national and international levels. In the discussion of the "rule of law at the national and international levels" at the Sixth Committee of the UN General Assembly, the Chinese representative put forward: "The rule of law is an important symbol of human civilization and progress." The discussion on this issue is not only conducive to expanding countries' efforts to strengthen the rule of law consensus, and reflects the desire of all countries in the world to work together to build a world ruled by law. Against the background of this era, promoting the rule of law in international relations is the right choice to follow the general trend and the historical trend.

 

In keeping with the trend of the times, President Xi Jinping emphasized: "We should jointly promote the rule of law in international relations. Encourage all parties to abide by international law and the universally recognized basic principles of international relations in international relations, and use uniformly applicable rules to clarify right and wrong, promote peace, and seek development. 'The law is the yardstick of the world.' In the international community, the law should be the common yardstick. There is no law that only applies to others but does not apply to oneself, and there is no law that only applies to oneself and does not apply to others. There cannot be any applicable law. Double standards. We should jointly safeguard the authority and seriousness of international law and international order, and all countries should exercise their rights in accordance with the law, oppose the distortion of international law, and the violation of the legitimate rights and interests of other countries and the destruction of peace and stability in the name of 'the rule of law'.

" We should create a future in which the rule of law, fairness and justice are pursued. The status and role of international law in global governance must be improved, and international rules must be effectively observed and implemented. Historical responsibilities, development stages, and coping capabilities are all different, and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities is not only not outdated, but should be observed."

 

Promote rationalization and fairness of international relations. Rationalization and impartiality are related concepts, so people usually use the word "fair and reasonable". Throughout the history of modern times, the establishment of a fair and reasonable international order has been the goal of mankind. 

The Communist Party of China, the Chinese government and the Chinese people have always been committed to the realization of this goal. 

Especially in recent years, President Xi Jinping has made a clear call: "We should jointly promote the rationalization of international relations. Adapt to the new changes in the international balance of power and promote the reform of the global governance system, reflect the concerns and demands of all parties, and better safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the vast number of developing countries. "

 

President Xi Jinping has called on a series of international occasions to build a fairer and more equitable international order, and to continuously gather progressive forces for global governance reform. 

On March 27, 2013, President Xi Jinping emphasized at the fifth BRICS leaders' meeting: We must play a constructive role in the reform of the global governance system and promote the development of the international order in a more just and reasonable direction. 

On July 20, 2014, President Xi Jinping held talks with Argentine President Cristina Cristina and emphasized that the two sides should closely communicate and cooperate on major issues such as global governance and reform of the international economic and financial system, safeguard the rights and interests of emerging market countries and developing countries, and promote The international order is developing in a more just and reasonable direction. 

On September 19, 2014, President Xi Jinping pointed out in his speech at the World Affairs Council of India: China and India should be global partners of strategic coordination and promote the development of the international order in a more just and reasonable direction. China and India should inherit and carry forward the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, adhere to sovereign equality, fairness and justice, common security, adhere to common development, win-win cooperation, inclusiveness and mutual learning, and make greater contributions to world economic growth and global governance through their own development. To provide solutions to global issues that represent the interests of the vast majority of developing countries. 

On January 17, 2017, President Xi Jinping pointed out in his keynote speech at the opening ceremony of the 2017 annual meeting of the World Economic Forum: "Humanity has become a community with a shared future in which you have me and I have you, and the interests are highly integrated and interdependent. Every country has the right to development, and at the same time, they should consider their own interests at a broader level, not at the expense of harming the interests of other countries."

 

The essence of promoting the rationalization and fairness of international relations is as follows: First, to adapt to the new changes in the international balance of power, promote the reform of the global governance system, reflect the concerns and demands of all parties, and better safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of developing countries. Since human society entered the 21st century, the contribution rate of market countries and developing countries to global economic growth has reached 80%. 

In the past few decades, the balance of international economic power has evolved profoundly, while the global governance system has failed to reflect the new pattern, and its representation and inclusiveness are insufficient. 

Second, fairness and justice are the noble goals pursued by people all over the world in the field of international relations. In today's international relations, fairness and justice are far from being realized. Under the new situation, we must uphold sovereign equality and promote equal rights, equal opportunities and equal rules for all countries.

 

lead economic globalization. Historically, economic globalization is an objective requirement for the development of social productive forces and an inevitable result of scientific and technological progress, and is not artificially created by some people or countries. 

Economic globalization has provided a strong impetus for the growth of the world economy, promoted the flow of commodities and capital, the progress of science and technology and civilization, and the exchanges between peoples of various countries. After the end of the Cold War, the historical changes of globalization have become more obvious in the world we live in. 

After entering this century, the speed of globalization has been further accelerated, which is effectively changing the production mode, life style and cultural form of human beings. It also profoundly affects the economic system, political system, legal system and people's way of thinking and behavior of human society. 

Globalization is a comprehensive concept, which represents the expansion of the scope of human activities, the scope of space and the form of organization, from the local to the national to the world. It also represents the development trend of human society, and it also represents the transformation of human perspectives in understanding and interpreting the world. Globalization includes at least economic globalization, public affairs globalization, human rights globalization, environmental globalization, and legal globalization, among which economic globalization is of decisive significance.

 

Economic globalization is a historical trend that is synchronized with economic modernization. It has contributed to the global flow of products, resources, capital, technology, ideas, and culture, and has contributed to trade prosperity, resource development, investment facilitation, technological innovation, and ideological revolution. and social change. Of course, "we must also admit that economic globalization is a 'double-edged sword'". 

Since economic globalization brings competition from domestic to international and from regional to global, this will inevitably lead to problems such as development imbalances, governance dilemmas, digital divides, and fair deficits around the world. Especially when the world economy is in a downturn, the global economic "cake" is not easy to grow, or even becomes smaller, and the contradictions between growth and distribution, capital and labor, efficiency and fairness will become more prominent, and the developed and developing countries will Feel the pressure and shock. As a result, the public opinion, trend of thought and movement of "anti-globalization" and "anti-globalization" surged. Under such circumstances, China should analyze the advantages and disadvantages, opportunities and challenges of globalization with dialectical thinking, and deeply realize that these are problems in progress. China must uphold the rules of the World Trade Organization, support an open, transparent, inclusive and non-discriminatory multilateral trading system, and build an open world economy. If we go against the general trend of globalization, engage in trade and investment protectionism, and set the scene for prison, it is doomed to be detrimental to ourselves and others. 

As President Xi Jinping pointed out: "What I want to say is that many of the problems plaguing the world are not caused by economic globalization. For example, in the past few years, the flow of refugees from the Middle East and North Africa has affected the world, with millions of Many people are displaced, and even many young children are buried in the sea on the way, which makes us sad. The causes of this problem are wars, conflicts, and regional unrest. The way to solve this problem is to seek peace, promote reconciliation, restoring stability. 

Another example is that the international financial crisis is not an inevitable product of the development of economic globalization, but the result of excessive financial capital seeking profits and a serious lack of financial supervision. 

Simply blaming economic globalization for the problems plaguing the world is not in line with the facts. In the face of the opportunities and challenges brought about by economic globalization, the correct choice is to make full use of all opportunities, cooperate to address all challenges, and guide the direction of economic globalization. Make the process of economic globalization more dynamic, inclusive and sustainable. We must take the initiative to act and manage appropriately, so that the positive effects of economic globalization can be released more, and the process of economic globalization can be rebalanced.

Efficiency, focus on fairness, and let different countries, different classes, and different groups of people share the benefits of economic globalization. This is the responsibility of the leaders of our era, and it is what people of all countries expect from us. Build a community with a shared future for mankind. On the basis of promoting the reform of international governance, building a fair and reasonable world order based on democracy and the rule of law, and leading the right direction of globalization, we will move forward in the direction of building a community of human interests and a community with a shared future for mankind. This is a proposition of the times and a global issue put forward by Chinese leaders. The report of the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China clearly put forward for the first time "advocating the consciousness of a community with a shared future for mankind". Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, General Secretary Xi Jinping has put forward the proposition of building a community of interests and a community of destiny in response to the "strong country must hegemony" and the "China threat theory". On March 27, 2014, President Xi Jinping explained to the world a community of shared destiny for the first time in his speech at the UNESCO headquarters, pointing out: "In today's world, human beings live in a world composed of different cultures, races, colors, religions and social systems. Here, people of all countries have formed a community with a shared future for you and me." On September 28, 2015, President Xi Jinping comprehensively and systematically explained the community with a shared future for mankind and its development direction at the 70th United Nations General Assembly. He pointed out: "In today's world, all countries are interdependent and share weal and woe. We must inherit and carry forward the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, build a new type of international relations with win-win cooperation as the core, and build a community with a shared future for mankind." A partnership of equal treatment, mutual consultation and mutual understanding, to create a fair and just, co-construction and shared security pattern, to seek open, innovative, inclusive and mutually beneficial development prospects, to promote harmonious but different, eclectic exchanges between civilizations, and to build an ecosystem that respects nature and green development system. On January 18, 2017, President Xi Jinping delivered a keynote speech on "Building a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind" at the United Nations Headquarters in Geneva, and further pointed out that to build a community with a shared future for mankind, the international community should focus on partnership, security structure, economic development, civilization exchanges, ecological Efforts in construction, etc. It is emphasized that we must adhere to dialogue and consultation to build a world of lasting peace; adhere to joint construction and sharing to build a universally secure world; adhere to win-win cooperation and build a world of common prosperity; adhere to exchanges and mutual learning to build an open and inclusive world; adhere to Green and low-carbon, building a clean and beautiful world. President Xi Jinping also emphasized the establishment of a community of shared future for mankind on a series of important bilateral and multilateral diplomatic occasions, and proposed to jointly build a community with a shared future for China and ASEAN, a community with a shared future for China and Pakistan, a community with a shared future for Asia, a China-Latin America community, and a China-Africa community with a shared future. China, together with other countries in the world, is committed to promoting world peace, stability, prosperity and progress. The concept of a community with a shared future for mankind is a forward-looking thinking on the development trend of human society on the basis of insight into the international situation and the general trend of the evolution of the world pattern. The theoretical cornerstone of order has been recognized by the United Nations and its affiliated organizations and widely supported by the people of the world. In short, to promote the reform of the global governance system and rules, promote the development and progress of international relations, and build a community with a shared future for mankind, in ideology and practice, it is to create a future in which everyone can do their best and win-win cooperation, and abandon the narrow-mindedness of "zero-sum game" Thinking, major countries should respect each other's core interests and major concerns, manage conflicts and differences, and strive to build a new type of relationship featuring no conflict, no confrontation, mutual respect, and win-win cooperation. Big countries should treat small countries as equals, and do not engage in domineering, buying and selling by force. More sharing and more responsibility; we must create a future where the rule of law, fairness and justice are pursued, ensure the effective compliance and implementation of international rules, adhere to democracy, equality, and justice, and build the international rule of law. No country can wage war at will or undermine the international rule of law. , cannot open the "Pandora's box"; to create a future of inclusiveness, mutual learning and common development, advocating harmony but different, allowing countries to find the most suitable countermeasures for their own national conditions; to promote a more balanced world economy and politics, more effective global governance, International relations are more democratic and just. The "Belt and Road" initiative proposed by Chinese leaders is a historic measure to build a community of shared interests and a shared future for mankind and achieve win-win and shared development.

 

3. Building a new world order: China's position and measures

To promote the reform of global governance and build a new world order, China's basic positions and concepts are: First, to promote the reform of global governance and build a new world order is not to overthrow the current world order, nor to start a new world, but to promote global governance The system is developing in a more just, reasonable and effective direction. President Xi Jinping pointed out in particular that we are not trying to overthrow the current system dominated by the United States. 

China hopes that the United States and developed countries will correct the unjust and unreasonable parts of the current world order and make the current international system more perfect. Foreign media said that Chinese President Xi Jinping called for a more just international order to reflect the new voices of Asian and African countries at a time when the influence of the two continents has increased significantly than in the past. China does not have the ability to overthrow the US-led system, nor does it mean to do that. Second, building a new order, or "reorganizing the world order," as foreign media put it, does not mean artificially abandoning the diplomatic strategy of keeping a low profile. 

Comrade Deng Xiaoping proposed that China should wait for the opportunity on the world stage, "hide its strengths and bide its time". For our country, the strategy of keeping a low profile has created a relaxed development environment for our country for 30 years and has made our country's economic development a great success. 

However, as China's economic strength is strong, both the United States and Europe have seen through the strategy of hiding, trying to change the rules and regulations of the process of economic globalization, reversing the adverse consequences of China's economic take-off on Western power, forcing us to face and participate in a trap full of traps. International power politics; whether China likes it or not, the Chinese government’s era of “keeping a low profile and never taking the lead” on the international stage has basically come to an end, and even the political leeway brought by the “anti-terrorism” war for China is rapidly disappearing. 

As the United States, Japan and some neighboring countries continue to touch China's core national interests, and we have to respond strongly, the days when we maintain a low profile internationally are no more, and we must actively participate in global governance and participate in the rules of the international game. formulated to effectively safeguard and expand China's national interests.

 

At present, in the strategic process of building a new world order, we still have many shortcomings to be filled, and we still need to make great achievements. 

Over the past few decades, especially since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, under the leadership of the CPC Central Committee with Comrade Xi Jinping at its core, China has played an important role as a participant, builder and contributor in global governance with a more confident and proactive attitude. 

On the global governance agenda, China is transforming from a rule-defying country to a rule-cooperating country, from a rule acceptor to a rule maker, and from a passive participant to an active decision maker. However, in general, we still have shortcomings that neither soft power nor hard power is strong.

 

The first is the fragility of the right to speak. General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out profoundly: The pattern of "the West is strong and I am weak" in terms of global discourse power has not fundamentally changed, and our country has not yet had the right to speak in many aspects, even in a state of "silence" or "aphasia", China's ability to set issues. 

The ability to participate in and lead the formulation of rules is still relatively weak, the international voice is still relatively small, and it is still in a situation where it cannot be rationalized or spread. 

There are many reasons for this, including problems in international communication capabilities and psychological problems in Western audiences, but an important reason is that our discourse system has not yet been established, and our country's development advantages and comprehensive strength have not been transformed into discourse. Advantage. 

Without its own discourse system, it cannot effectively demonstrate or justify its own claims and actions, and it is impossible to talk about the right to speak and dominate international affairs. 

The function of discourse power is reflected in two aspects: 

in the domestic aspect, it is manifested as the leading and dominant power of discourse, that is, the ability to lead ideology and public opinion; in the international aspect, it is manifested in the influence and dominance of discourse , and that translates into the ability to participate in international affairs and rule-making. The main symbol of discourse power is the international influence of discourse, which in turn depends on whether we can create a discourse system that has our own ideological connotations, conforms to the laws of human social development and globalization trends, and has charismatic and universal demonstration effects. 

Can we create an ideology that the world accepts. We may disagree with Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations" and Fukuyama's "End of History", but we have not come up with an equally influential theory. 

On March 27, 2014, General Secretary Xi Jinping quoted a famous saying by Napoleon in his speech at the UNESCO headquarters in Paris: There are two forces in the world: the sword and the mind; in the long run, the sword is always defeated by the mind men. This just shows the great significance of generating ideas, forming an ideological system, and then forming a discourse system. It also shows that China should not only supply various commodities to the world, but should also include ideas and civilization achievements. We must not only let the world know "China on the tip of the tongue", but also let the world know about "China in academia", "China in theory", "China in philosophy and social sciences", and let the world know about "China in development" , "Opening China", "China Contributing to Human Civilization".

 

The soft power of the right to speak is of course based on hard power. Hard power such as economics, politics, and military is the supporting force for a strong voice, but it is not the only decisive force. Power and the right to speak are not a natural correspondence. For example, the United Kingdom, although its economic strength has declined, still has a relatively strong voice in global affairs. 

Once the power of discourse is formed, it has relative independence, because the basis of the power of discourse lies in whether a country can produce an ideological system with world influence. 

China's current economic hard power has increased significantly, but it is faced with a serious lack of discourse and the problem of "discourse deficit". The foundation of discourse and discourse power lies in genuine theoretical innovation and discourse quality. Therefore, it is crucial to build one's own academic discourse system and ideological system to compete for the right to speak. To this end, my country's philosophy and social sciences must be good at extracting iconic concepts, creating new concepts, new categories, and new expressions that are easily understood and accepted by the international community, and guiding the international academic community to conduct research and discussions. Each discipline must build a systematic discipline theory and concept. 

It is necessary to encourage philosophical and social science institutions to participate in and establish international academic organizations, support and encourage the establishment of overseas Chinese academic research centers, support foreign societies and foundations to study Chinese issues, strengthen exchanges between domestic and foreign think tanks, and promote overseas Chinese studies. 

It is necessary to focus on issues of common concern to the international community, launch and lead the organization of research projects, and enhance the international influence of my country's philosophy and social science research. It is necessary to strengthen the construction of excellent foreign language academic websites and academic journals, and support the promotion of high-level research results to foreign countries. 

Scholars should be encouraged and supported to participate in international academic conferences, publish academic articles, tell Chinese stories, spread Chinese ideas, and provide Chinese wisdom.

 

The construction of our own discourse system should reflect the common values ​​of the world. We oppose some Western countries imposing their own values ​​and value systems as "universal values", but we cannot deny the common values ​​of human society. 

At the 70th United Nations General Assembly, President Xi Jinping clearly stated:

 "Peace, development, fairness, justice, democracy, and freedom are the common values ​​of all mankind and the lofty goals of the United Nations." 

Since 2014, President Xi Jinping has On other major occasions, a series of propositions and concepts with international compatibility were put forward and expounded, for example, "a community of global interests"; "a community with a shared future for mankind"; "peace and development are still the two major themes of today's era"; "civilization is a colorful inclusive, equal and inclusive"; "building a new type of international relations featuring peace, development, cooperation and win-win", all of which have had a wide range of ideological and political influences, especially with "peace, development, fairness, justice, democracy, freedom" 

The proposal of "common value for all mankind" as the core has made us stand on the commanding heights of value and morality, laid a value foundation for the construction of a community of human interests and a community of destiny, and also freed us from passive criticism on the issue of value. situation.

 

Second, China's comprehensive strength to dominate international relations and world order is far from enough. After years of hard work, China has made historic progress in its development. Its economic aggregate ranks second in the world, its foreign exchange reserves are the world's largest, and its trade in goods ranks first in the world. However, as a country with a population of nearly 1.4 billion, its per capita GDP ranks around 80th in the world, and the problems of unbalanced, uncoordinated and unsustainable development are still prominent. And if China considers its social construction, social order and social civilization, our cultural construction, educational level, scientific and technological innovation capabilities, including social science theoretical innovation, the external influence of core values, our ecological civilization, food and drug safety, production Combined with factors such as security conditions, our ranking will be lower. Therefore, General Secretary Xi Jinping reminded us to stick to our country's national conditions and adhere to the positioning of developing countries. 

As a developing country, even the largest developing country, it is easier said than done to dominate the rules of the game and the economic and political order in the world. When it comes to raising the right to speak and building a world order, the key is to strengthen hard power. This is why General Secretary Xi Jinping has repeatedly emphasized that we must strengthen capacity building, continue to strengthen ourselves, and do our own affairs well and better. Only then can China have a greater right to speak internationally, only then can we grasp the rules of the game, and only then can we master our country development initiative.

 

4. The rule of law is the fundamental guarantee for building a new world order

The rule of law is an inevitable requirement for advancing the reform of the global governance system and building a new world order. The construction of the international rule of law and the global rule of law is the only way to promote the modernization of global governance and the rule of law in the world order. To this end, we should strive to do the following:

 

i. Resolutely safeguard the world order based on the UN Charter

President Xi Jinping pointed out at the United Nations General Assembly: 70 years ago, our ancestors established the United Nations, the most universal, representative and authoritative international organization with far-sightedness, to entrust the new vision of mankind and usher in a new era of cooperation. This initiative is unprecedented. Seventy years ago, our ancestors gathered the wisdom of all parties to formulate the United Nations Charter, which laid the cornerstone of the modern international order and established the basic norms of contemporary international relations. This achievement has far-reaching consequences. 

China is a founding member of the United Nations and the first country to sign the United Nations Charter. China will firmly uphold the international system with the United Nations at its core, the basic norms governing international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, the authority and status of the United Nations, and the central role of the United Nations in international affairs. 

As far as international relations and world order are concerned, the United Nations is the most important platform for us to participate in global governance, promote the restructuring of international relations, and build a new world order. Just imagine, if China was not a founding member of the United Nations or a permanent member of the Security Council, and if the People's Republic of China did not confirm the status of a permanent member of the Security Council at the same time when it restored all the legitimate rights of the United Nations in 1971, what would my country's international status be like? So, We will continue to uphold the international order and system centered on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, and the authority and seriousness of international law and order. 

President Xi Jinping pointed out that the various confrontations and injustices in the world today are not because the purposes and principles of the UN Charter are outdated, but precisely because these purposes and principles have not been effectively implemented. 

The role of the United Nations in addressing global threats and challenges is irreplaceable and remains an important platform for strengthening and improving global governance. In addition to the UN Charter, countries have reached a series of international conventions and legal instruments on political security, trade development, social human rights, technology and health, labor property rights, culture and sports and other fields based on the UN Charter. 

The life of the law lies in its implementation, and it is the responsibility of all countries to safeguard the authority of the international rule of law, exercise their rights in accordance with the law, and perform their obligations in good faith. The life of the law also lies in fairness and justice. 

All countries and international judicial institutions should ensure that international law is applied equally and uniformly. Double standards should not be adopted.

 

In addition to the United Nations and related international organizations (such as the World Trade Organization, the World Health Organization, the World Intellectual Property Organization, the World Meteorological Organization, the International Telecommunication Union, the Universal Postal Union, the International Organization for Migration, the International Labour Organization, etc.), my country should also use Global and regional dialogue and cooperation platforms such as G20, BRICS, APEC, China-US, China-EU, China-France, G77, SCO, etc. 

Using these platforms, Chinese leaders shed light on China's deep understanding of the world's major issues and China's solutions. 

Take the G20 as an example. The G20 is the first global economic governance mechanism in which China participates as a shaper, a founding country and a core participant. 

Since 2013, China has actively cooperated with developed countries to strengthen international macroeconomic policy coordination, strengthen financial risk management and control, and promote the global governance structure and the share reform of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. 

Actively support non-traditional issues such as energy, climate change, food security, infrastructure investment, and anti-corruption to be included in the G20 agenda. Every time the Chinese leader makes a statement at the G20 summit, it stands out. 

In September 2013, President Xi Jinping delivered a speech "Jointly Maintain and Develop an Open World Economy" at the 8th G20 Leaders Summit held in St. Petersburg, Russia, advocating that the G20 should "firmly maintain and develop an open world economy", and proposed Global economic governance thinking with three core concepts of "development and innovation", "growth linkage" and "interest integration". In November 2014, at the 9th G20 Leaders Summit held in Brisbane, Australia, President Xi Jinping delivered a speech on "Promoting Innovative Development and Realizing Linked Growth", which further enriched these three concepts and their policy guiding significance. 

In October 2016, the G20 summit was held in Hangzhou, China. As the presidency, China has made outstanding contributions to promoting the G20 to truly become a "stabilizer" for the world economy, a "catalyst" for global growth, and a "promoter" for global economic governance. Sustained, balanced and inclusive growth provides China's solution.

 

ii. Actively participate in international legislation and strive to lead some important legislation

The "Decision" of the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee stated: "Actively participate in the formulation of international rules, promote the handling of foreign-related economic and social affairs in accordance with the law, enhance my country's voice and influence in international legal affairs, and use legal means to safeguard my country's sovereignty, security, Development interests." 

At the 2015 Central Economic Work Conference, General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out that we should make good use of the opportunity of my country's rising international discourse power and rule-making power, actively participate in the reconstruction of rules, and create a favorable international environment for my country's development. The Outline of the Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the People's Republic of China proposes that China will actively participate in the formulation of international rules in new fields such as cyber, deep sea, polar regions, and air and space. 

The Central Military Commission's "Decision on Further Advancing the Law and Strictly Governing the Army" also stated: "Actively participate in the formulation of international military rules, and enhance the voice and influence of our military in international military and legal affairs." These are all promoting international legislation. major decisions and initiatives. By actively participating in or leading international legislation, we will inject China's position, claims and values ​​into the international legal system, and promote good law and good governance in the field of global governance. We cannot be absent from international legislation.

 

iii. Actively participate in international law enforcement

China has always been the defender of the international order. As a permanent member of the UN Security Council, China has participated in UN peacekeeping operations for 27 years. It has become a major troop-contributing country and funding country for peacekeeping operations, and has been recognized and praised by the international community. 

In 2015, President Xi Jinping announced at the UN General Assembly that China would join the new UN Peacekeeping Capacity Standby Mechanism, and decided to take the lead in establishing a standing peacekeeping police force and a peacekeeping standby force of 8,000 people. 

China has decided to provide the African Union with a total of 100 million US dollars in free military assistance in the next five years to support the construction of the African standing army and the rapid response force for crisis response. The "Decision" of the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee also proposed to "actively participate in international cooperation in law enforcement and security, and jointly combat violent terrorist forces, ethnic separatist forces, religious extremist forces, drug trafficking, and transnational organized crime."

 

iv. Actively participate in international judicial institutions and judicial activities

Judiciary is the line of defense to maintain fairness and justice, and it is also the symbol of human civilization. 

Since the reform and opening up, we have taken an active and cooperative attitude towards international justice, respecting and supporting international justice that speaks justice and makes fair decisions. Three jurists have served as judges of the United Nations International Court of Justice (Ni Zhengyi 1985-1994, Shi Jiuyong 1994-2010, of which he served as President of the International Court of Justice from 2003 to 2006, and Xue Hanqin since 2010), and three jurists served as the United Nations on the former Yugoslavia issue. 

Ad hoc judges of the International Criminal Court (Li Haopei, Wang Tieya, Liu Daqun), three jurists serving as judges of the United Nations Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Zhao Lihai, Xu Guangjian, Gao Zhiguo). 

Out of respect for international law and international justice, many laws of China clearly stipulate that if the international treaties concluded or acceded to by the People's Republic of China have different provisions from the laws of the People's Republic of China, the provisions of the international treaties shall apply, but the People's Republic of China declares reservations. except for the terms. Where there is no provision in the laws of the People's Republic of China and international treaties concluded or acceded to by the People's Republic of China, international practice may apply. 

China suggests that the provisions at this legal level can be regarded as a general principle in the Constitution, which stipulates: "The international treaties and important agreements concluded and acceded to by the People's Republic of China, as well as the international customary laws that have been explicitly accepted by the People's Republic of China, constitute the legal system of the People's Republic of China. Part of it, except for treaty provisions that declare reservations. If the laws of the People's Republic of China and the treaties and important agreements concluded or acceded do not provide for it, international practices may apply." Improve China's judicial assistance system, expand the coverage of international judicial assistance, strengthen international cooperation in anti-corruption, and increase overseas recovery of stolen goods, fugitives, repatriation and extradition." In the field of international justice, China fully respects and support impartial justice, but when it involves the core interests of the country China will never accept judgments of abuse of judicial power in cases of

 

v. Do a good job in foreign-related and international legal services

"Strengthen foreign-related legal services, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese citizens and legal persons overseas and foreign citizens and legal persons in my country, and protect the rights and interests of overseas Chinese in accordance with the law." 

At the same time, it is necessary to provide good legal training and legal services for developing countries. In particular, it is necessary to actively prepare for the establishment of the “Belt and Road” economic and legal dispute arbitration center, resolve conflicts and disputes through diversified mechanisms such as consultation, arbitration, and justice, provide good legal services for the implementation and realization of the “Belt and Road” strategy, and create a good legal environment. .

 

vi. Strengthen the construction of international legal talent team

China's legal talent team is extremely unsuitable for the urgent needs of economic globalization, legalization of international relations, and the construction of a new democratic, fair and reasonable order. From the perspective of the new trend of economic globalization, with the accelerated flow of people, logistics, capital and information on a global scale, economic, trade and personnel exchanges between countries have continued to increase, and the international legal service industry has further expanded. As the world's second largest economy, with the in-depth implementation of the "bringing in" and "going out" strategies, foreign-related legal affairs are increasing, and there is an urgent need for a large number of lawyers who are proficient in international rules and good at handling foreign-related legal affairs. 

But at present, there are less than 3,000 lawyers who can handle foreign-related legal business proficiently in China, and less than 50 lawyers who can handle "double-reverse and double-guarantee" (anti-dumping, countervailing, safeguard measures and specific product safeguard measures) business. The Appellate Body has only a few lawyers who conduct business independently. 

At present, 35% of the global anti-dumping investigations and 71% of the anti-subsidy investigations are aimed at Chinese export products. Due to our lack of corresponding legal services, the loss is huge. In response to this severe situation, General Secretary Xi Jinping emphasized: "It is necessary to strengthen capacity building and strategic investment, strengthen theoretical research on global governance, and attach great importance to the training of talents in global governance." 

The "Decision" of the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee also requires "Building a team of foreign-related legal talents who are familiar with international legal rules and good at handling foreign-related legal affairs."

 

vii. Coordinate the overall situation of domestic rule of law and international rule of law. 

It is the basic concept and basic experience of our party's governance of the country to coordinate the two overall situations. 

General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out: " China has entered a critical stage of realizing the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. 

The relationship between China and the world is undergoing profound changes, and the interconnection and interaction between my country and the international community has become unprecedentedly close. Participation in international affairs is constantly deepening, and the world's dependence on my country and its influence on China are also deepening. 

When we observe and plan reform and development, we must consider and comprehensively use both international and domestic markets, international and domestic resources, and international and domestic resources. 

Two types of rules." The "Proposal of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Formulating the Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development" and "The Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the People's Republic of China" adopted by the Fifth Plenary Session of the Eighteenth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China In the Outline of the Annual Plan, one of the six principles that must be followed in building a moderately prosperous society in an all-round way is to “persist on coordinating the overall domestic and international situations”. 

In the field of rule of law construction and rule of law development, we must also adhere to the overall planning of the domestic rule of law and the international rule of law, and correctly handle the relationship between the domestic rule of law and the international rule of law. 

By coordinating the overall situation of the domestic rule of law and the international rule of law, we can better use the domestic and international rule of law to safeguard my country's legitimate interests, and build a good external environment for China's prosperity, prosperity, and sustainable and stable development. 

Coordinating the two overall situations contains rich ideological connotations. The core is to actively participate in discussions on international public affairs, participate in global governance dialogues, and be good at expressing China's views in the discourse of the rule of law. It clearly expresses China's concerns about international public affairs, and demonstrates its stance on establishing and maintaining the international rule of law, and promotes the formation of an international rule of law pattern in all aspects and fields. 

This approach not only enables the world to recognize China's image of a country governed by the rule of law, but also enables China to establish confidence in the rule of law in its active participation in international affairs. This method can also promote the benign interaction between the Chinese rule of law and the international rule of law, and more appropriately express and safeguard China's interests in the establishment and operation of the international rule of law. 

The international rule of law will also be more balanced, comprehensive and just due to China's active participation. status.

 

When China becomes a country under the rule of law, realizes a strong country under the rule of law, and shows a good image of a country under the rule of law internationally, our status and role in global governance will be revolutionized.

Eighth, actively carry out legal diplomacy. "Legal diplomacy" is a new vision for observing and thinking about diplomatic issues, and a new dimension for dealing with foreign relations. Legal diplomacy is the same important foreign affairs as political diplomacy, economic diplomacy, cultural diplomacy, military diplomacy, political party diplomacy and so on. 

"Legal diplomacy" not only includes law-related activities in traditional diplomacy, such as judicial assistance, signing treaties, international litigation, etc., but also refers to diplomatic activities with law as the content, mechanism and medium, that is, the rule-of-law thinking and the rule of law approach throughout diplomacy.

During the activities, he is good at transforming certain diplomatic issues into legal issues, transforming foreign-related conflicts and disputes into judicial cases, handling foreign affairs with legal rules and procedures, resolving diplomatic disputes in accordance with the law, changing diplomatic methods and methods, and opening up new prospects for diplomatic work. 

To comply with the general trend of the rule of law in international relations, we must be good at taking political, economic, cultural, military, environmental and other issues as legal issues to carry out diplomatic activities. In fact, international organizations such as the United Nations and Western powers have regarded legal diplomacy as an important part of their diplomacy and placed them in key areas of policy and strategy. 

It is necessary to be good at using the rule of law to resolve conflicts between countries, conflicts between regions, and conflicts between interest groups. Actively carrying out legal diplomacy to promote the international rule of law will help maintain peace and promote the development of consensus and seeking common ground while reserving differences. Develop and strengthen cooperation. 

Diplomacy is an art. Turning some diplomatic issues into legal issues can, on the one hand, dilute political ideology. Diplomatic practice has repeatedly proved that if political ideology is too obvious, it will be in a passive position in international relations; on the other hand, it can be achieved through legal channels and methods. 

Disputes can be resolved, and conflicts can be transferred, or the problem can be locked at the legal level, or some conflicts can be transformed into "judicial cases". 

Legal diplomacy can promote beneficial exchanges between my country and other countries on the rule of law issue, which is of positive significance for enhancing understanding, expanding consensus, and strengthening the rule of law at the domestic and international levels. In this sense, legal diplomacy will surely promote the comprehensive development of my country's diplomatic career to a higher level. He is good at using legal diplomacy to resolve the "China threat theory" and strive for diplomatic initiative.

 The way of legal diplomacy is equal, stable and long-term, and it is based on norms. Respecting and abiding by the law will make foreign countries have more confidence in our country, and make the world more believe that our country is a country that will not. A responsible power that dominates, loves peace, and keeps its promises. 

Legal diplomacy can also make our national interests and diplomatic claims more legitimacy, legitimacy, more convincing, and easier to be recognized by the international community, so we can take the initiative in diplomacy.

 

Refer Also: NWO 2022


See also:

Ponzi Scam


[[>>Share on Social Media for Awareness to Help Someone who may be in Need of this Info, Share>> >>

  

Full of confidence Biden says A New World Order will be established soon and will continue to be led by the US

Facts have proved that no matter how the international situation changes or what kinds of problems and crises the United States faces at home, the United States will always be full of ambitions when it comes to serving as a "world hegemon" and "leading the world."

Biden attended the conference to deliver a speech, talking about the "new world order"

According to a report by the Global Times, citing Russia Today TV, a few days ago, US President Biden delivered a speech when he attended the quarterly meeting of CEOs held by the US business organization "Business Roundtable". The report pointed out that in his speech, Biden expressed his views on the current world situation, the inflection point of the world situation, and the new world order. He firmly believes that the future leader of the new world order will still be the United States.

 

Biden said: "The world is now at an inflection point that occurs every three or four generations, and the outcome of this inflection point will be determined by the United States. Between 1900 and 1946, 6,000 people died, and since then, the United States has A free world order has been established, so it's been a long time since that kind of thing happened. There's a lot of people dying now, and it's not as chaotic as it was before, but it's time for a change."

 

New World Order Infographics

 

Will the US lead the 'new world order'? 

Biden makes rhetoric

"There will be a new world order in the future, and we must lead it. We must achieve it with the rest of the free world," Biden stressed.

 

Over the years, the United States and the West have repeatedly exaggerated the so-called "new world order". In order to contain China's development and weaken China's influence, the current US government has repeatedly slandered China for its attempt to establish a "new world order" and subvert the current situation. world pattern. 

It seems that for the United States, no matter how the world changes or how the regime changes, the leader of the world and the defender of the world order must be itself.

 

 

Biden's remarks have been criticized, and the term "new world order" should be mentioned with caution

The report emphasized that after Biden's speech about the "new world order" came out, it immediately attracted widespread attention in the United States and around the world. Then people from all over the world expressed their views on this, saying that the meaning of the term "new world order" has changed now, and Biden, as the president of the United States, should not mention it casually.

 

Relevant news pointed out that over time, many people now agree that the so-called "new world order" represents an elitist conspiracy theory of establishing an oppressive global government, so it is best not to use the word casually. 

Russian media revealed that many Western politicians and government officials have been widely criticized and criticized for using the term "new world order" before. A country that oppresses and oppresses other countries at any  time.

 

What are the New Strategic Ideas for the NWO?

President Bush formally proposed to the joint session of Congress on September 11, 1990.

Chinese name New World Order Foreign name The New World Order English abbreviation NWO Proposed time September 11, 1990 Proposed location Joint meeting of the two houses of the United States Congress

 

The main contents are:

(1) To build a "stable and secure" world that, on the one hand, consolidates the achievements of containment and maintains a military force against the Soviet Union, and on the other hand effectively copes with regional conflicts and problems such as environmental pollution, weapons proliferation, drug smuggling, terrorism, Issues that transcend national borders, such as the global economy;

(2) Consolidate and advance "freedom" and "democracy" globally, and promote "political pluralism" and "free market economy" in accordance with American values. 

In order to achieve the above goals, the United States should play a leading role.

Based on the alliance, coordinate the collective actions of all countries in the alliance and share responsibilities

Strive for US-Soviet cooperation and establish a US-Soviet cooperation system, interests, maintain regional stability.

Play the role of international organizations, especially the United Nations

Emphasize the importance of solving global economic problems for the establishment of a new world order.


Whoa re the 8 Largest Shareholders of the Fed?

The eight largest shareholders of the Fed are listed as follows:

1. Rothschild Rothschild Bank in Berlin and London

2. Lazard Brothers Bank in Paris

3. Israel Moses Seif Bank in Italy

4. Lehman Brothers Bank of New York

5. Kuhn, Loed Bank in New York

6. Chase Manhattan Bank in New York

7. Goldmansuchs Bank of New York

8. Warburg Bank in Amsterdam

 

                                                                                                    

New World Order and Illusion of Safety

It seems to be a fate. Many books on the theme of national security will be labeled as "conspiracy theories" to varying degrees. This "Illusion of Safety" is probably the same. The reader's eyes are sharp. Whether or not this book is a conspiracy theory is up to the reader. However, what we are going to talk about below is really a conspiracy theory.

 

First of all, let's introduce a mysterious organization - Freemasonry. Like terrorism, it also has ancient and modern distinctions. 

Ancient Freemasonry is said to date back to Biblical times, and was founded by masons in biblical times, so the word Freemasonry literally means free masons. 

Don't underestimate the masons, they were the only ones who mastered geometry and natural sciences. 

Regarding the purpose of this organization, it is generally believed that it is to restore the order of God, but there are also sayings that the organization does not believe in God at all, and instead regards God as Satan in disguise, which must be exposed and overthrown. That is, the organization is anti-religious, and its weapons are reason and knowledge. This is irrelevant, after all, it was thousands of years ago. The one that should be concerned is modern Freemasonry. 

With the development of the times, the word Freemasonry is no longer literally translated as "free mason", but translated as "sympathy for each other", "mutual aid", "congenial" and so on. This is also the ostensible purpose of the organization, which is to advocate fraternity and charity, and to pursue personal virtue and a perfect world. But what is its real purpose? According to conspiracy theorists, unify and rule the world!

 

How to bring about the New World Order?

 through money. It is said that the first modern Freemasonry was born in England in 1717, when there were a total of 700 Freemasons. 

The reason why there are so few is because the organization has always preferred shortages rather than abuses. 

If you want to join Freemasonry, the premise must be white aristocrats and the upper bourgeoisie. 

The initiation ceremony of Freemasonry is also said to be very wicked: one must lie in a coffin for 24 hours, first to show the loyalty of the members, secondly to test the courage of the members, and thirdly to let them experience the complex life from death to resurrection from the dead experience, which makes the organization seem extremely mysterious.

 

Infographics on Freemasonry and the New World Order

Later, in order to gain more influence, Freemasonry began to relax the membership requirements, but at least it must be a middle class, and even if the middle class can join the association, they can only do small things like paying money, running errands, and developing members. 

The core of Freemasonry has always been the great nobles, and it has always been the original intention of Freemasonry to absorb larger nobles. 

Because the Freemasonry never expects to use the power of the bottom to overthrow the countries of the world and unify the world, their idea is to directly incorporate the royal families and governments of the world into their own system. This is not a fantasy. 

Take the United Kingdom as an example. George IV, George VI, Edward VII, Edward VIII, and some members of the royal family who were crown princes but failed to sit on the throne have all joined Freemasonry. If it weren't for the fact that Freemasonry banned women from membership, the Queen of England might have been a member too.

 

Later, Freemasonry began to develop into Western Europe and British overseas colonies. In 1733, the British colony of North America, which is today the United States, established the first Freemasonry House, St. John's House, and soon, the house accepted a young man who would attract global attention in the future: Benjamin Franklin. 

More than 40 years later, he and several American Freemasons, including George Washington, successfully overthrew British colonial rule and established America. Of course, this is what conspiracy theorists say. George Washington is indeed a Freemason. In 1920, the American Freemason members also built a "George Washington Freemason Memorial" for him. But whether Benjamin Franklin was a Freemason or not, there is no such strong evidence as the memorial. 

Also, the fact that Washington is a Freemason does not prove that Freemasonry is behind American independence. 

Objectively speaking, Freemasonry only played a role in the process of American independence, even if it was a big one. For example, some people say that most of the funds needed by the American independence movement were provided by the Freemason Hayan Solomon, and that at least 31 of the 63 generals under Washington were Freemasons. But that still doesn't tell you exactly what. 

Others say that among the more than 40 presidents of the United States, only Lincoln and Kennedy never joined the Freemasonry, and as a result, they were assassinated one after another. In fact, as we all know, not only Lincoln and Kennedy were assassinated among American presidents, Garfield and McKinley were also assassinated, and Theodore Roosevelt and Reagan were assassinated but survived.

 

But then again, Freemasonry does exist in today's world. There are 4 million members in the United States alone, 1 million in the United Kingdom, and the remaining 1 million scattered around the world. Its members are indeed mainly rich and powerful. 

In addition, Freemasonry is said to have planned and participated in all major events in modern history, including the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution, and the two world wars. This is of course also said, but we might as well go down this line of thinking.

How can Freemasonry do this? The answer is money. So money - where did the huge sums of money come from? Conspiracy theorists believe it is the Federal Reserve, that is, the Federal Reserve is an organization affiliated with Freemasonry. So where did the money come from before the Federal Reserve (1913)? 

It is the Rothschild family that has lasted for more than 300 years and is extremely wealthy. The history of when the Rothschilds began to become so prosperous is uncertain, but anecdotes about Nathan Rothschild, a key figure in the family, taking advantage of the 1815 Battle of Waterloo are well known. There is a saying in 19th-century Europe that there were six great powers in Europe i.e. Britain, France, Russia, Austria-Hungary, Prussia, and the Rothschilds. 

Today, the top five empires are all gone, and only the Rothschilds are still in their prime. This is because it entered and dominated the US economy in time, and then took control of the world economy with the help of US military chariots. It is said that even the famous Rockefeller family and the Morgan family were raised by Rothschild. 

It's still rumored, of course, but conspiracy theorists remind us to look at the US dollar bill: the pyramid on the back has two Latin phrases: "Novus Ordo Seclorum", which translates to "A New Order of the Ages", which is translated into Chinese as "New World Order" - which is the purpose of the aforementioned Freemasonry - "to unify and rule the world".

 

At least I think it's a conspiracy theory. In contrast, I prefer to believe that the U.S. government has more urgent ambitions for world domination than Freemasonry. 

Of course, this does not rule out that the U.S. government and Freemasonry are mutually beneficial communities. Below, we combine the above possibilities into one, and continue to explore the potential threats to world security from the two.

 

Let's start with the "new world order". As early as when George W. Bush was in charge of the United States, it was already a globally known US strategic vision. American author Jim Mars wrote in his book What Happened to America:

 

"Through radio talk shows and Internet blogs, many people who are following are trying to find out something about the 'globalists' plan to control the world, the 'new world order' that President Bush referred to, and this concept is also Used by Adolf Hitler. These people call themselves 'globalists', believing themselves to be above the weak nationalism, and even the entire planet in their sphere of influence. 


New World Order and Illuminati

In their global map, the US has There is not so much oil and water to squeeze. They also adhere to the philosophy of the 'Illuminati', which is "to achieve the end, do whatever it takes." However, these people will never admit that they and those ancient secret groups, or the It has nothing to do with the Nazis who made this statement politically explicit."

 

"No matter what we call them, including the mouthpiece media and bribed politicians, we should understand that the 'new world order' does exist and is 'for a while and for all time'. 

Woodrow Wilson once wrote that in During the Russian Revolution, a huge sum of money flowed into Russia from the United States to finance the Bolshevik Party, the predecessor of the Communist Party, and it was Rockefeller and other Wall Street capitalists, such as Jacob Schiff, Elihu Root, J.P. Morgan, and the Harriman family (W. Averil Harriman served as ambassador to the Soviet Union during World War II) were the same people who funded the Association of Foreign Relations.

 

"But later on, the worldwide socialist movement terrified these capital predators, and they needed the various political and economic blocs to compete and create tension to maximize their interests and control. So they started Turned to support the German Nazi Party. With their funding, German military chief Adolf Hitler further strengthened his National Socialist German National Workers Party to fight the fierce trend of the Communist Party and laid the groundwork for the Second World War. 

Three of America's biggest names helped finance the Nazis, including Citibank Chairman John McIlroy, Schroeder Bank agent Alan Dulles (including his older brother John Dulles), and Prescott Bush, a director of the Union Banking Organization and the Hamburg American Shipping Company. 

Interestingly, after World War II, John McIlroy became the senior commissioner for Allied-occupied Germany, John Du Ruth became President Eisenhower's secretary of state, Alan Dulles became the longest-serving CIA director, and Bush, as a Connecticut senator, played an important role in the establishment of the CIA. 

It is worth mentioning that Mike Roy and Alan Dulles were both appointed by President Lyndon Johnson to the Warren Commission to investigate the assassination of President Kennedy, but the agency was controversial at the time. After World War II, the 'globalist' program Focused on the establishment of the United Nations. 

In fact, a multinational organization called the 'League of Nations' was established before this, but this organization was eventually dissolved because the US senators believed that this would weaken national sovereignty."

 

Jim Mars' books take up a good deal of that discussion, but that alone is enough to show that the "new world order" not only exists, but is so evil that Americans hate it. Because the order it seeks to establish is an evil order "designed to exploit and oppress everyone, to control the entire society, and to manipulate the entire world by bankers and a handful of elites." The "everyone" mentioned here also includes ordinary Americans. 

The "very few elites" mentioned here include Prescott Bush, the father of Bush Sr. and the grandfather of Bush Jr., mentioned by Jim Mars. Jim Mars also mentioned Woodrow Wilson, the 28th president of the United States, a figure I prefer to look at from a strategic perspective rather than a conspiracy theoretic perspective. He is a typical academic president, with the "highest academic status" among the successive U.S. presidents, and is highly romantic and idealistic. Therefore, he wrote an article criticizing Rockefeller and others for funding the Bolsheviks. 

The "League of Nations" was also advocated by Wilson, and its purpose was to establish a post-war international order led by the United States. This order is actually the predecessor of the "New World Order" proposed by Bush Sr. in the future, but Wilson called it "The New World". President Franklin Roosevelt proposed a similar concept: "moral order" or "world blueprint." 

It was only because Wilson "died before his ambitions" that Roosevelt could not survive until the end of World War II, while Bush Sr. came to power just in time for the end of the Cold War and the United States becoming a superpower. It will be more well-known and exciting than the theories of the two predecessors, and it is not limited to Americans.

 

At that time, few people doubted the justice of the Gulf War launched by the Bush administration to punish Iraq's aggression, and it achieved "win and go". Failed to do so; its use of the Gulf War to actively advocate the establishment of a "new world order" is, at least literally, understandable. However, Bush Sr is by no means an angel, and even Wilson is far from it. Henry Kissinger and others, who are well versed in the meaning behind the "new world order", bluntly criticized the Bush administration as "unrealistic", and considered the idea of ​​it to dominate the world based on its outstanding military strength as an "illusory dream". 

Facts bear this out: Bush's "new world order" has drawn widespread criticism due to its emphasis on "leadership" by the United States and countries "giving up their sovereignty." Although he lowered his tone in time, he still failed to win re-election. After his opponent Clinton took office, he also kept silent about the "new world order", but replaced it with a more operational "expansion strategy": continue to unite allies, work hard Expand its "unipolar" advantage.

 

Clinton's "expansion strategy" was also highly sought after. In 1999, during his second term, the famous American scholar William Wolfers published the article "Stable Unipolar World" in the country's "International Security" magazine, and proposed the "unipolar world" for the first time. with "single-stage stability theory". He believes that the post-Cold War world is a unipolar world under the leadership of the United States. As the only remaining superpower, the United States has a unique geopolitical status and is also the only major power with global action capabilities. No other major power in the world can compete with it. , as long as the United States does not make major mistakes, it is unlikely that a major power like the United States that can "take the lead in any link of power" will emerge in the next few decades. 

Contemporaries of American scholars also followed suit and published personal "unipolarism" works, such as Charles Kraut Hammer's "The Moment of Unipolarity", Huntington's "The Hegemony of Solitude", Richard Haas's How America Became the Boss, etc.

Only a very small number of people such as Henry Kissinger are willing to admit that the "unipolar era" in the United States is true and touchable, but it is historically abnormal. The United States has been able to dominate the world for ten years, which is really the result of the combined effect of various factors. The power to check and balance the United States has always existed and is growing in an orderly manner. 

As early as when Bush Sr. proposed the "New World Order", he said: "Don't be too busy to implement the 'New World Order', let's take a look at the 'New World Order'." Kissinger, known as the "Master of Balance of Power", has Soberly aware that "unilateralism" dominated by "unipolarism" will bring the United States into a crisis. 

By the time of Clinton's administration, the crisis had become evident. He saw the recovery of Russia and the development of China, and also saw the decline of internal cohesion in the West that lacked a common enemy. He also saw that the US economy was no longer as glorious as it used to be, and it must first face challenges from Germany, Japan and other allies.

Only Neither saw nor thought of terrorism. After the "9.11 Incident", the United States used its powerful voice to shape itself into a victim and a teacher of justice, but it once again abused the world's sympathy. Years of foreign wars have finally ended the "unipolar era" of the United States, and the "multipolar era" has come.

 

Although the term "multipolar world" has long been familiar to everyone, the formation of a "multipolar world" in the true sense will not be earlier than the 2008 Russo-Georgian War. It can be said that it was the first foreign war that Russia started and won after the end of the Cold War that laid the initial pattern of a "multipolar world". 

Today, the United States is still the only superpower, but the "new world order" has long been replaced by the "new world order". 

As far as Eurasia is concerned, the simple and uniform confrontation between the United States and Russia in the past has now evolved into a complex game involving the United States, Russia, Europe, and China. There are also countries such as India and Japan on the periphery, ready to join the rivalry at any time.

 

So far, it's time for the Freemasonry. In the multipolar era, what will the organization plan? It is said to be the more evil "population reduction plan". To put it simply, Freemasonry still wants to rule the world and colonize the world, but it no longer needs too many slaves. Because global resources are increasingly scarce, too many slaves are not good for slave owners, so it wants to control the world population within 500 million. 


 What is this concept of the New World Order as per Freemasonry as Media shows?

In 2011, the world's population has exceeded 7 billion, of which Caucasians account for about 54% of the world's population. That is to say, if the "population reduction plan" of the Freemasonry is true, then according to its assumption, the yellow race and the black race are all "damned", and even 85% of the white people will disappear from the earth. That's why Freemasonry, and possibly a government controlled by the American elites with which it is a community of mutual interests, has drawn strong domestic criticism from people like Jim Mars.

 

What exactly is the "population reduction plan" of the New World Order? 

Jim Mars and others believe that it is nothing more than the two weapons of food and bacteria.

 NWO and Food Control

The first is to control food, at two levels: control the food industry and promote genetically modified crops. Let's talk about the first level. Remember Henry Kissinger's famous saying, "Whoever controls the food controls the mankind", it would be too much of a joke to say that the United States controls the mankind, but the fact that the United States controls the food is a fact for all to see. 

Today, the four multinational companies that control the global grain distribution: ADM, Bunge, Cargill and Louis Dreyfus. Except for Louis Dreyfus, which is a French company, the other three are American companies, and Louis Dreyfus is also inextricably linked with the United States. contact. 

These four companies are known in the industry as the "four major grain merchants". They control 80% of the world's grain trading volume, and they have frequently used grain as a weapon with Western governments to check and balance any country they want to check and balance. For example, the comprehensive sanctions imposed by the West on Russia not long ago, including food, were implemented by Louis Dreyfus. Before that, Russia's food import business was almost completely monopolized by it. 

NWO and GM Crops

We have already talked about the siege of the four major grain merchants around the world, especially in Asia, and will not repeat them here. What needs to be repeated is the issue of GM crops that we also mentioned.

 

New World Order and GMO

If I am wise enough, I shouldn't mention GMO anymore, because a large number of experts have said countless times before that "GMO foods approved by the government are absolutely safe." Frankly speaking, most people are absolute layman when it comes to GMOs, so they cannot assert that "GM foods are absolutely unsafe", but it is a matter of national security, and the issue of GMOs must be discussed again.

 

What is certain at the moment is that eating genetically modified foods will not harm your health. However, fears about it are known to be mostly genetic. The genetic problems will take at least several decades to appear, so even in European and American countries, there has always been a fierce controversy over genetically modified foods. Domestically, the well-respected academician Yuan Longping said not long ago, "I'm in my 80s, and I have no problem eating it. If the young people who are fertile have no problem eating it, their next generation will also have no problem, that is. "Real safety", the implication is that even Yuan Longping cannot guarantee that genetically modified food will have absolutely no effect on future generations. That being said, it is really premature to promote GM crops.

 

In addition, I have more thoughts about genetically modified foods. First, promoters of genetically modified foods often claim that Americans also eat genetically modified foods. This may be true, but even if it is true, one should ask: 

Who are the people who eat genetically modified foods? Does the President of the United States eat? Did the president of Mondusan, the creator of genetically modified food, eat it? 

If they don't eat it, only ordinary Americans eat it, and everyone will inevitably think of what conspiracy theorists call a "population reduction plan." Second, don't ignore the "energyization" of food that the United States carried out very early. 

There is nothing wrong with using the food produced by genetically modified technology to produce industrial alcohol. Likewise, if India's and China's GMO experts are committed to producing more food for energy production without taking up existing arable land, who would object?

Compared with food, using bacteria as a weapon is undoubtedly more terrifying and more uncontrollable. 

According to Jim Mars and others, even AIDS was created by American bioengineers and "Nazi eugenicists" who immigrated to the United States. It is the product of germ warfare experiments, produced in laboratories in the United States between 1969 and 1972, specifically to eliminate those "undesirable." Jim Marst specifically mentioned that at a subcommittee in 1969, then Deputy Secretary of Defense D.M. MacArthur said: "In the next five to 10 years, we are very likely to develop a new infectious microorganism, which is similar to the Infectious organisms as we know them in the past are different in many important ways. 

The main thing is that this virus is not controlled by the immune system that humans rely on to fight infectious diseases, and there is no cure." Again, cannot be based on this paragraph It is a well-known fact that the United States simply identified the United States as the culprit behind AIDS, but after World War II, the United States shipped all the core personnel of the bacteriological warfare from Nazi Germany and fascist Japan to the United States for their own use, rather than putting them into justice. 

The fact that the United States provided Saddam with the biological and chemical weapons it developed during the Iran-Iraq war is also a fact that the U.S. government has covered up in every possible way but has already leaked it. 

Whether the United States intends to reduce its domestic population is unknown, but the United States has never really cared about the lives and deaths of people in other countries. This is the real reason why Freemasonry-related conspiracy theories are so popular internationally. There's a lot more in Jim Mars's writings, and I don't fully agree with him, objectively speaking, but we should at least be prepared in the spirit of preferring to believe what's there over what's not. 

Pay attention and take precautions. Even if all the conspiracy theories mentioned above are facts, there is nothing to fear. Conversely, even if only a tiny fraction of the above-mentioned conspiracy is true, it is not something that any country that the mastermind behind it intends to attack can afford it.

 

Will The new "New World Order" Accelerate the Evolution?

Reference News Network reported on March 11 that Singapore's "The Straits Times" website published an article titled "New "New World Order" on March 8. The author is a professor at the Lee Kuan Yew Center for Innovative Cities at the Singapore University of Technology and Design, and a non-resident of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Singapore. Ambassador Chen Qingzhu. The full text is excerpted as follows:

 

One week has so much impact on global affairs.


Before February 24, strategic analysts viewed the new world order emerging after the Cold War as a fundamental tug-of-war between the U.S. and China, including zero-sum competition. The shape of this order is still to be determined, and no one is willing to take a firm view on what the future will look like. Such was the case with Russia's attack on Ukraine.

 

Russia's offensive against its neighbors reinforces this attitude, as it inadvertently brings about a pattern that pops up earlier than we expect. This sudden pattern could become a fixed pattern and evolve into a new "New World Order".

 

World tearing up is bad for China

What we are currently seeing is that the US and Europe (and treaty allies such as Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and South Korea) are on the anti-Russian side, while China could be drawn into the other, and the rift between the two sides is solidifying.

 

But it's not just a simple Cold War-style adjustment to the past. The situation is much more complicated. This rift will not be based solely on security and military issues, it will also affect the flow of investment, trade and technology. This will lead to a higher degree of decoupling, which is likely to be very chaotic due to the close interdependence of the US, European and Chinese economies.

 

Where will other countries stand in this rift? Much will depend on what happens around the Russian-Ukrainian war in the coming months. Is it a short war, or a long war with heavy losses on both sides? 

Will Russia stop with Ukraine under the NWO? 

Russia that expands the war beyond Ukraine might even make friends think twice, while Russia, which has long been internationally isolated, cannot be an attractive pole.

How will Putin and Russia recover? How will the Western Alliance respond to Russia?

The new "New World Order" will be a more sophisticated version of the old Cold War order for several reasons.

 

China wants its relations with the United States and Europe to remain stable. Unlike Russia, China is strategically cautious rather than reckless. It is not in China's interest to tear up the world order.

 

Keeping an eye on Russia's next move will be a priority for NATO and Europe. While the United States and its Western allies will be distracted by Ukraine and Russia, China will have to deal with the complexities of Sino-Russian relations and its implications for China’s global economic interests. With domestic economic growth a major concern, China does not want further shocks.

 

India's attitude towards Russia and the US is subtle

A key question in this reorganization of the world order is India's place in the new "new world order". Although it is a member of the "Quartet Security Dialogue", India abstained from voting on the draft resolution on the Ukraine situation in the UN Security Council and the UN General Assembly, which must have made the United States extremely unhappy.

 

The Soviet Union and India were staunch allies, and Russia and India continued to maintain friendly relations. India relies heavily on Russia for military weapons and equipment. Russia remains a useful ally of India.

 

But current trends suggest that India will stand with the West at a critical moment in dealing with China's rise, although India will maintain its independence of action even on security issues.

 

The ten ASEAN countries have their own interests, but they will focus on the dominant global trends. Among ASEAN countries, only Vietnam and Laos abstained from voting on the draft resolution on the situation in Ukraine at the UN General Assembly. Most ASEAN countries are likely to choose a security order led by the United States, but at the same time would welcome an economic order led by China.

 

A third space should be allowed to exist

While analysts have long refused to claim that the international situation is returning to the Cold War, we are now witnessing a return to the old Cold War order with some differences.

 

The United States and Europe have become active and resolute again about setting the rules for international responses when sovereign states are blatantly invaded. Remaining neutral may no longer be an option in Europe.

 

But elsewhere there will be a group of countries that will separate alliances in security and economic areas. They do not see this as a contradiction, nor as an exclusive alliance. They want to be in the third space, but will act with the US or China, depending on the issue. They do take a stand on key issues.

 

Over the past 30 years since the end of the Cold War, many Asian countries have developed economic and political institutions and taken steps to advance their own interests. They have a certain awareness of their own dynamism. In this context, the leaders of the new "New World Order" can listen to the concerns of interested parties and allow this third space to exist, thereby winning more adherents.



Refer Also: Will You be like Slaves

 


[[>>Share on Social Media for Awareness to Help Someone who may be in Need of this Info, Share>> >>

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget