Civil Servants Salaries in Russia
Do you know how much Salary Russian civil servants earn?
According to data released by the Russian Federal Statistics
Office, the average monthly salary income of public officials of federal state
organs in 2016 was 115,700 rubles, an increase of 4% over 2015.
In the list of wages of public officials of the federal state
organs in 2016, the Russian government is at the top of the list, and the
average monthly salary income of its officials is 228,500 rubles, a decrease of
1.4% from last year. The President's Office ranked second, with an average
monthly salary income of 218,600 rubles, an increase of 0.7%.
The average
monthly salary of Russian Federation Audit Office officials is 180,700 rubles,
a decrease of 3.7%, ranking third.
The average monthly salary of the Federal Council officials
of the Upper House of the Russian Parliament is 176,100 rubles (up 1.3%), the
State Duma of the lower house-154,800 rubles (up 13%), and the Constitutional
Court-136,200 rubles (up 10.4%)
Among the executive authorities, the highest income is the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation-147,200 rubles (reduction
of 0.7%)
In addition, the Federal Ministry of Finance-140,100 rubles (up
7.0%)
The Federal Ministry of Emergency Situations-137,900 rubles ( Increase
33.9%)
Federal Treasury Bureau-120,300 rubles (a decrease of 27.5%)
Russian
Federal Office of Presidential Affairs-117,900 rubles (an increase of 5.9%)
Federal Taxation Office-117,800 rubles (an increase of 6.3%)
Among them, the federal agency with the lowest income is the
Federal Agency for National Affairs. The average monthly salary of officials is
53,900 rubles, a decrease of 23.6% compared with last year.
The exchange rate of the ruble to the US dollar has been
rising. The current exchange rate of the ruble to the renminbi is 1 ruble =
0.1178 yuan.
It is easy to calculate the salary level of Russian officials.
What is the monthly salary of Russian President Putin? In
2016, Putin’s salary was 715,000 rubles per month, which is roughly equivalent
to $ 11,500.
Russian civil servants have big monthly salary gap
According to the latest statistics released by the Russian
National Statistics Office, in 2016, the average salary of local civil servants
in the Russian Federation increased by 11.5%.
For national civil servants, the
average salary is 45,000 rubles, and the
autonomous organ is 37,800 rubles.
As of the end of
2016, there were 685,300 national civil servants and 306,500 self-governing
organs.
Russian Federal State Statistics Office data shows that the
highest monthly salary of Russian civil servants is not from Moscow (83,600
rubles). But from the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Region, the local national civil
servants salary of 165,900 rubles.
It is worth mentioning that in parts of Russia, the salaries
of civil servants did not rise but fell in 2016. These areas are mainly
concentrated in the Southern Ural region and Trans Ural.
Among them, the
average salary of civil servants in Kurgan Prefecture in 2016 was 41,500
rubles, a decrease of 1.1% from 2015.
Chelyabinsk region was 47.98 million
rubles, a decrease of 4.5% from the previous year, and Kantmansi Autonomous
Region was 95,400 rubles, a decrease of 5% from the previous year.
What class of civil servants are Russia and Eastern Europe?
It is well known that the Communist Party of the Soviet
Union, Eastern Europe, and socialism have all collapsed.
So what class does the concept of civil servant or "person in the system" used by them refer to?
It actually refers to the "bureaucratic class" or
"bureaucratic profiteering class".
"Civil servant" was originally a concept used by
Western capitalist countries, and refers to the personnel used by government
departments, while others have to rush to the market to follow the "social
jungle law" or "social Darwinism".
The government departments
are controlled by the big bourgeoisie, the ruler of the "social jungle
law", and serve the big bourgeoisie.
The concepts of "civil servants" (or
"institutional personnel") and "non-civil servants" (or
"non-institutional personnel") are themselves manifestations of the
nature of capitalist society .Also, the adoption of these concepts in Russia and
Eastern Europe means they agree Capitalism.
Because during the Soviet period led by Stalin (that is, the
period when there was no "change"), all the people in the Soviet
Union and Eastern Europe were "inside the system" (the state-owned
property was owned by the whole people), and what was needed from the West?
What about the concept of "civil servants"?
It turned out to be good,
because most of the population became "non-institutional" personnel,
resulting in severe social unemployment, to the point where young girls in
Russia and Eastern Europe went out for prostitution in large numbers.
In the former socialist countries such as the Soviet Union
and Eastern Europe, large and small bureaucratic classes formed if they were
given the privilege to operate state-owned assets, or (in the case where
"civil servants" could not do business in person), let their
relatives or cronies do business.
Bureaucratic bourgeoisie
That is to say, the
bureaucratic class and the bureaucratic bourgeoisie may be combined into one or
separate, but even if they are separated, they are also a life-and-death
community of interest.
When the governments of the former socialist countries such
as the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe compromised and surrendered to the
Western capitalist countries, and their bureaucratic bourgeoisie was gradually
constrained by the other party in the economic exchanges with the Western
capitalist countries. Finally, they could not extricate themselves, then
bureaucratic The class was branded as a "comprador" and became a
bureaucratic comprador bourgeoisie.
This is a major feature of today's world
Only by using class theory to analyze the world (and also
acknowledging the dictatorship of the proletariat) can it truly stand on the
stand of socialism, otherwise it must be representative of the bourgeoisie or
other exploiting classes, and it must be anti-Marxism and Lenin And Mao Zedong
Thought.
Of course, Russia and some Eastern European countries are
awakening, especially Russia. Under Putin’s leadership, they are actually
taking a path of returning to socialism, which is not only reflected in the
political, military and cultural.
The toughness of the capitalist countries is
also reflected in the economic recovery of free health care and free education
and other benefits for all people, so that Russian nationals are not completely
"non-institutional" personnel in a certain sense.
This is the hope of
the resurgence of socialism.
The ringer must be the one who rings the bell. If
the return of socialism in the world can start from Russia, then it will have
the most convincing power and the greatest hope. In this sense, Putin can
become the greatest socialist rescuer.
In the past, world public opinion believed that the Soviet
Union and Eastern Europe were not as economically developed as Western
capitalism, and were the result of socialism. But the historical fact that the
Soviet Union relied on socialism to realize the basic industrialization of the
country in the two to three hundred years of Western capitalism in two to three
decades is a powerful refutation of this conclusion.
Now that Russia and
Eastern Europe have been engaged in capitalism for two or three decades, have
they caught up with Western capitalist countries?
Not only does it not, but it
can be said that it is far worse, because you are a vassal, does international
capitalism suppress you?
So after all, it is necessary to return to socialism
to be able to fundamentally catch up with capitalism, and this possibility is
increasing, because we have seen the end of capitalism in the global chronic
capitalist crisis.
The original socialism in the Soviet Union and Eastern
Europe, to put it bluntly, is public ownership, that is, economic democracy,
that is, employment and welfare for all. But it still lacks socialist political
democracy.
This basic form of political democracy should be universal popular
suffrage under the ruling party of the proletariat, that is, the masses of the
people.
By excluding the non-proletarian or non-popular factors in the
multi-party campaign and relying on regional governance performance competition
to produce excellent candidates under the ruling party of the proletariat, that
is, the masses, the bourgeoisie is ruled out.
The possibility, on the other
hand, makes the whole people exercise their political power.
Soviet Union and Eastern Europe
The Soviet Union
and Eastern Europe will not defeat the so-called democratic election system
under the capitalist multi-party system (both represent the bourgeoisie)
without establishing such popular socialist one-party popular elections, and
will be deceived by capitalism.
It was replaced by a fake democratic political
system, and it had to be completely economically subordinate to capitalism.
This is the profound political reason for the failure of the socialist cause in
the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe.
Only by their own reflection and the
establishment of a true socialist political and democratic system can they
ultimately be able to not only in the economic system, but also in the
political system, that is to decisively defeat capitalism in all directions.
Note: The global chronic capitalist economic crisis here
refers to the rapid recovery of the economic recovery that can be brought about
by any scientific and technological breakthrough when today's comprehensive
science and technology such as information technology, cracking technology, and
counterfeiting technology are highly developed.
The overproduction of Chengxin has caused the recovery and
prosperity that has been longer in the past to become shorter and shorter until
it is negligible, and the entire social economy is always in recession and
depression for a long time.
Common sense tells us that if a person has an acute
fever, he will soon recover and return to a healthy state, but if a person has
a chronic fever, that is, three days and two ends, and a fever all year round,
how big is he?
What is the chance of recovery?
The same is true for the social
economy:
When the chronic capitalist economic crisis occurs, how many years can
capitalism remain?
Therefore, the future of the world must be socialism.
> SHARE this article >>