Is Islam a Religion or Cult?
If it is
said that the world has the most controversy, the most intense religion, and
the world’s most headachesome and most respectable religion, it is estimated
that everyone will choose Islam. Since the moment when terrorists hijacked
planes and hit the World Trade Center almost 20 years ago, Islam is an
obscurity, it has not fallen down, and has even died. It has been leapfrogged
by Kalofi (non-Islamists). It has become a hotspot for the hot search of news
all year round, the most prominent soup medicine that tears the world’s ethnic
groups, and it has become a synonym for love and hate in the world. This
organization, which has been forgotten by civilization for a hundred years,
finally made it withered in the hands of its extreme disciples and
grandchildren, and the iron tree blossomed all over the world. Of course, this
is not a good word.
Ancient Religions
The three
ancient religions in the world, Christianity has been completely secularized,
Buddhism continues to stay in the philosophical speculation of the Eastern
nations, and Islam still maintains the traditions and dogmas inherent in the
Middle Ages.
The characteristics of civilization are still monolithic. Into the
outside world, everybody is blind, but everyone has a blind impression, but
they all have a common understanding:
Muslims are still a rather mysterious
group, even the secularized Muslims (the boss of Quni), He still adheres to
strict rules and regulations, and the humility and fear of doctrine in his
heart is beyond words.
So what kind of dogma is Islam really as horrible as our
general public thinks?
The view
that Islam is a cult can be divided into the following:
1. A
Muslim who has given up Islam must worry about being killed by another Muslim
This is
the primary commandment of Islam. Because of this, few Muslims give up their
faith. This simple fact casts the shadow of cults on Islam. It’s hard to avoid
talking about the importance of this cold fact about Islam.
This
practice is widely followed throughout the Islamic world today, and the most
commonly cited source of Islamic theology in support of this practice is
Bukhari Hadith Article 6922:
Allah’s Messenger said, “If anyone changes his
(Islamic) faith, kill “Death him.” The http://WikiIslam.net website states: “In
Islam, abandoning faith is a serious crime. The punishment for apostasy
prescribed by the Prophet Muhammad is death.”
In
Afghanistan, NATO had to use European asylum commitments to lift Said Musa out
of prison for committing a crime of reforming Christianity.
However,
Hua Tianjun consulted with Queenny ’s boss. In the eyes of such “moderate
Muslims”, this precept is used in Islamic countries and is a tacit
understanding among family members, not a universal truth in the Islamic world.
If a Muslim has arrived in a non-Islamic country and his family has agreed to
it, the believer has not spoken words that discredited the prophet and the founder
after the apostasy, and the religious community can open and close his
apostasy. .
2. Muslims
are encouraged to commit violence in the name of Islam
The Muslim
theological classics of the Qur’an and the Sunnah are full of words that
encourage devout Muslims to commit violence in the name of Islam. Some scholars
have done statistics. The two classics that advocate violence account for more
than 60%. It can be seen that the core of the entire religion is “to show the
greatness of Allah with sword and blood.”
Here are
just a few points:
• Where to
find unbelievers and kill them there (2: 191)
• Fight
against disbelievers close to you (9: 123)
• When
opportunities arise, where to capture the mate and kill them there (9: 5)
• No
religion other than Islam (3:85)
• Jews and
Christians are debauchery; they must be cruel (9:30)
• If the
property owner criticizes Islam, crucify them or cut off their hands and feet
(5:33)
• Punish
unbelievers, tailor fire coats for them, boiling water will be poured on their
heads, and their internal organs and skin will be dissolved by boiling water
(22:19)
• Don’t
want to be in peace with the disbelievers; when they meet the disbelievers,
they should be killed (47: 4)
In
addition to the Muslim theological classics mentioned above, Islamic social
norms also encourage violence. It is widely noted that Friday is the day when
jihadist attacks are most likely to occur in Muslim societies. This is because
Mullahs are using Friday’s pulpit to encourage their flocks to commit violence
in the name of Islam.
In Muslim society, even the media are involved in
inciting violence. The Middle East Media Institute has translated thousands of
articles from print and electronic media. These translations are full of
statements that directly incite violence in the name of Islam.
But these
claims were answered differently in front of the boss, who would quote other
non-violent verses to deny outsiders’ allegations of violence against Islam,
and consider outsiders to be out of context.
When people come up with these
translated verses and discuss with him, he will say that it is because the
prophet must use violence to integrate his team and tribe in order to establish
his own country and army.
What if there is no iron-like discipline? Can quickly
destroy the deadly peace of Asia and Africa?
It’s as if a country has a
country ’s laws, which are “pioneer politics.” When the Islamic world is large
enough and peaceful, Muslims will let go of hatred and start to promote
inclusiveness. In the Middle Ages, the Islamic world Is it more tolerant than
Christian Europe?
Although
the boss of Queenie talked about this issue lightly and ignored the high taxes
imposed on Kafir by medieval Muslims, his views can still be used as a very
valuable reference.
3. Islam
does not allow any criticism or change
Islam
believes that anyone who criticizes or attempts to change Islam has committed
blasphemy. The crime of blasphemy is a major crime under sharia law. Therefore,
any Muslim who criticizes or attempts to change Islam has to worry about being
killed by devout Muslims.
At the end of 2013, in Denmark, an 18-year-old Muslim
named Yahya Hassan recited a poem criticizing Islam on television and received
countless death threats. What happened to Theo Van Gogh in Amsterdam. He
produced a short film about Islamic women. When Van Gogh went to work one
morning, he was murdered by a devout Muslim named Mohammed Bouyeri.
During the
trial, the killer told the court that Van Gogh insulted Islam. “My motivation
for doing this is purely my belief,” Boyeri continued. “The law that ordered me
to kill anyone who insulted Allah and the prophets was my motivation.” The
tragedy of the French “Charlie Weekly” also made the world see the bloody facts
To make
matters worse, Islam encourages devout believers to “spontaneously” implement
Sharia law. This means that any devout Muslim, if found to have done something
he believes is offensive to Islam, could commit atrocities anywhere in a flash.
However,
the boss of Quinny has a different argument. He believes that most Muslims are
serene and will not intervene in these political vortices, and human nature has
a mentality of maintaining their beliefs. Do you listen to others’ stigma? Will
the Pope be happy?
Apparently, the quinny boss confuses personal resentment
with personal violence, and uses “extreme Muslims” to deny the exclusiveness of
violence in Islam.
To sum up,
Islam hides a very strong incompatibility, and this view that is incompatible
with the human civilization of the 21st century has made him step into the
quagmire of cults, causing profile and criticism in all parts of the world. Of
course, many political leftists will be Muslim platforms. They will continue to
use the terms “moderate” and “minority extremists,” and define Islam as “a
minority of extremists. They use the name of peaceful religion to fight against
humanity.” “Islam is misunderstood by them and is also a victim in itself.
Islam and Terrorism
In
addition, as most “moderate Muslims”, they also hate the terrorists, thinking
that they are not doing the true teachings of Allah, but for the outside world’s assertion that “a mouse poop has broken a pot of soup”, I hate it too much.
After each terrorist attack, moderate Muslims will also be distressed, but
immediately the words turn around and they will say, “The easiest way for us to
vent is to focus on the point of anger, and simply type the words” kill the
green religion “on the keyboard.
But ask yourself, tens of thousands of
retweets, and hundreds of thousands of people’s attention, do you really
believe that this can solve the problem?
Then he said blindly, “Nothing to do
with xx”, “They are very few”, “European people died because of XX incident”,
“Religion that is peaceful in nature”, “Most Muslims are peaceful and kind”,
The doctrine is blablabla. “No amount of discourse can even improve the
perception of others.
As an
independent individual, since being a moderate Muslim group can bring various
social benefits (beef and mutton subsidies, additional independent cafeterias,
extra points for college entrance examinations, praying during work hours will
not be deducted, etc.) that is also shouldn’t they also bear the corresponding
social responsibility?
In fact,
most Muslim believers have shied away from their responsibility in recent
years. Once a violent incident occurs, they will shirk responsibility to “a
very small number of people”.
No one here requires ordinary and peaceful
Muslims to clean their portals with a knife But calling for the expulsion of
terrorist membership, cursing, or announcing that attackers and organizers
targeting civilians are destined to be inferno.
The public needs your voice,
and improving the stereotypes of Muslims also requires your voice. But moderate
Muslim representatives have chosen to keep quiet on such matters.
Here is an
inappropriate example to counter the fallacy of moderate Muslims:
For example,
Shanghainese and Beijingers are excluded, and locals look down on the presence
of such people?
Of course, there are many people, but there will be many
Shanghainese and Beijingers who come out and say that I am also a local. I
think this view is mentally handicapped.
These local families have a house, a
car, and even outsiders. Read silly, how does a city without outsiders develop?
Such answers and situations are also very common. If you contact more people,
you will find that Shanghai people and Beijing people are exclusive or
non-exclusive. There are good people and bad people. Most people don’t add
xenophobia to all Shanghainese and Beijingers.
Conversely,
there is very little such atmosphere in Muslims. For example, some terrorists
here exploded yesterday. Today, there are extremist slaughter villages.
Tomorrow they will manage other grocery stores to sell wine or promote female
circumcision. A group of people draw comics.
Few peaceful Muslims have stood up
and said, “This group of people are crazy. They are cults. We must be
absolutely different from them. They misinterpret the doctrine blablabla. We
have to renounce them!” The reality is that once someone opened a map cannon
and attacked the whole Muslims, there will be Muslims saying how can you do
this, most Muslims are peaceful and kind, a small number of people do not
represent us all, you misunderstand us.
However, extremism has caused evil in some
places. Those non-radical Muslims will definitely not say aloud that they are
doing a good job, but most of them also choose to be silent. They are not
likely to publicly express their views and it is difficult to see their
position.
This kind
of thing happened again and again. What do you make people of other faiths
think about it?
The argument often heard is: “Muslims are mostly good people,
and extremists do not represent all Muslims.” At the same time, those who hold
this argument will use other religions or similar events in modern society to
demonstrate this theory.
Some Muslims have shot and bombed buildings, and
children who have grown up in Catholic religious families have serial killers;
some have imprisoned abductions in Muslims, and handsome Christian priests have
also liked to insult choir boys; Muslims do not respect equality between men
and women.
Domestic violence enthusiasts
On the other hand, every terrorist
wanted and detained at Guantanamo prison is a Muslim, but it cannot be said that
Muslims are terrorists.
From the
beginning, I also felt that their logic was correct. I felt that something was
wrong over time. The child who grew up in a Christian family said that I became
a serial killer because of my psychosis.
The Catholic priest said that I
molested the little boy because of my childhood experience. Domestic violence
enthusiasts said that I smoked my husband’s whip because I enjoyed this kind of
play, which made me want to stop. When Muslim extremists encounter bad things,
they will say that this is our tradition and our teaching.
Did you find a
difference? Extremists and terrorists will say that I have followed the
teachings, and it is my belief that made me do this. Is it wrong now to say
that extremists do not represent Muslim culture?
Conclusion
So, is it
true that Islam is clear and true? Is it really a wronged white lotus? Is it a
piece of white paper used by ambitionists? Perhaps people with a little
conscience will cause deep thought. A religion that stays in the Middle Ages,
but has no choice but to cope with the rapid changes of contemporary society.
Such a game of history and reality, terrorists and extremism may be the mantis
arm blocking the car, or the lever that overturns the car. It’s really hard to
speculate. The way forward is whether the east wind overwhelms the west wind,
or the turban covers the T-shirt.
See Also: Islamic Halal Certification
> SHARE this article >>